Talk:List of rock-cut temples in India

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Prakasam district#Bhairava Kona Caves|Bhairavakona Caves]] The anchor (#Bhairava Kona Caves) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Article on Buddhist grottoes

The German wikipedia features an extensive article on the Indian, Chinese and Southeast-Asian Buddhist, hinduist and daoist cave temples and grottoes. --Diggindeeper 06:58, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maharashtra

@Hockeycatcat: I'm little bit confused, but may I know, that "Unexplained content removal" was a reason for your revert or was it explaining your edit ?. I've not removed any content or never without explaining. I think you got some misunderstanding, please check your edit again. You will find, you've removed some content instead, which I had restored, when were removed by an another editor. I think it was just an misunderstanding mistake. But if it is not just an misunderstanding mistake, please let me know the reason more clearly. ThankYouVeryMuch. JaMongKut (talk) 11:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JaMongKut: I don't even know what I was doing. I was exhausted on the day that I made that edit, so I probably accidentally reverted it. I have never in my life edited Wikipedia whilst asleep, but I think that has happened here! I have restored your version. I don't even remember making this edit, and I can see that I was wrong. Moral: never edit Wikipedia whilst asleep!

Self-trout. Please discuss this on your talk page next time, though. Cheers, Hockeycatcat (talk) 12:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I didn't even give you a warning on your talk page, which is what I always do after reverting edits. I definitely wasn't thinking right. Wow, that's weird... Hockeycatcat (talk) 12:21, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hockeycatcat: No Problem, it happens. Okay from next time, I will discuss it on my talk page, but hope and wish such time will not come :). Cheers!!! JaMongKut (talk) 12:32, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem. JaMongKut (talk) 12:32, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

India

Naveen Ramanathan, I think your reversion of the edit seems to remove content, also there's no reason mentioned. I've reverted your edits, because I find there was no problem with the content. But if you still think your edit was reversion was correct, Please mention your reason here. Thank You. JaMongKut (talk) 09:08, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]