Talk:List of representative offices of Artsakh

Artsakh High‑importance

	List of representative offices of Artsakh is within the scope of WikiProject Artsakh, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Artsakh and Artsakhians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArtsakhWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsakhTemplate:WikiProject ArtsakhArtsakh articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles

lead sentence

I recently undone one edit [1] - see Foreign relations of Nagorno-Karabakh for Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Transnistria recognition. Also, the edit makes some unclear statement "which itself is not recognised by any member." - it's unclear what members this is about. If these are UN members, then this is undue weight. There are sovereign states non-members of the UN (the most famous example is Switzerland that stayed outside of the UN until 2002). Alinor (talk) 10:29, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recent disruptions

Altering the lede and removing key information is not acceptable. The lede concisely presents Artsakh's geographical location, its limited recognition (by three states with limited recognition), as well as, its de jure/de facto status. Artsakh is in the South Caucasus, Artsakh is de facto independent, all three states within the CDRN recognize Artsakh, while all recognized countries recognize Artsakh as de jure part of Azerbaijan. Each of those four statements are true, all are already clearly present in the lede. Removing such information is not helpful to the article, while altering lingo to suite a desired WP:POV is far from constructive. Archives908 (talk) 13:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]