Jump to content

Talk:List of porridges

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Merge list from Porridge

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Currently there's a similar list to this article at Porridge; this would surely be better being kept in one place, with Porridge having a more prominent link to this article. —me_and 11:08, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose List of articles are completely different by their nature. By merging, you are guaranteeing that all the things that would go into the list would be deleted out of the main article, resulting in less information for the reader. The main talks about the general topic, the list is a reference list for further research. Dennis Brown - 23:49, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The main article can still talk about the general topic. Information that is in the Varieties list in the article not present in the List can be moved across.Ben Finn (talk) 08:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ironic that this took a few years to resolve, but I think it is pretty clear that there is no real desire to merge the two. Lists are navigational devices as well as informational devices, so it's clear that if this were brought to an RFC, it would be overwhelmingly be kept as a stand alone list. As far as I'm concerned, the status quo is consensus if you can't muster more than 1 vote to change every 2 years. Dennis Brown - 12:38, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of porridges. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:43, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Polish "paciara" / "paciarka"

[edit]

Traditional Polish (and maybe other Central European) dish made from roughly ground wheat meal or maybe other grain meal. My grandparents ate it a lot in the 80s and 90s. Can be eaten in its own or with a source of protein. It's mainly a provincial, rural dish from poorer areas and it may be less common these days when meat became both more affordable and more popular in Poland (and other Central European countries) after the "transformation".

Anyone else hear of it? Ralphhalgas (talk) 08:55, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pol. Paciarka / Zacierka (?)

[edit]

As in previous talk point, it may be that Lesser Poland "paciarka" is called "Zacierka" elsewhere and the word means "moonshine vodka" in eastern borderlands. Ralphhalgas (talk) 09:00, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Couscous

[edit]

Shouldn't cous-cous be in the list? I think it is one of the most common porridges. 84.33.74.206 (talk) 12:29, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]