Jump to content

Talk:List of papal bulls

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Glasgow

[edit]

The University of Glasgow in Scotland was incorporated by Papal Bull in 1451. I don't have further details.

List from Papal bull

[edit]

The following list was removed from the Papal bull article as it is redundant with this article. There may be some from this list that need to be incorporated into this article. -- Stbalbach 21:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dum Diversas and Romanus Pontifex

[edit]

Regarding two edits ([1], [2]) by User:Yuioplkjhga, which I have just reverted: I am no authority on either bull. Still, before modifying this list, it seems reasonable to modify the bulls' own articles. Get a consensus there (among people to whom these bulls are of interest), and then modify the list. — Itai (talk) 11:14, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bulla Turcorum

[edit]

Folks -- I've added a reference to this one. Hopefully I've at least got the date right. It reads Millesimo Quadringentesimo L sexto duodecimo kalendas Iulii. It's more commonly known (and titled) as Bulla Turcorum, but it seemed to me that the incipit was Cum hiis superioribus annis impius nominis...

Hopefuly someone who understands Latin can decode this. A nice digitized copy of Gutenberg's print of the bull and a transcription of the text (some mistakes) are at the Princeton University Library Digital Collections Kbs (talk) 05:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Missing bull

[edit]

I dont know the name of this bull, so wouldnt be able to add it in it was in the early 500s (1503 I think) that allowed Princess Catalina/Catherine of Aragon marry Prince Henry of England (later Hnery VIII) they needed the bull as Catherine was Hnery's brother Arthur's widow. Can anyone add it in? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.56.79.248 (talk) 09:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest adding 'Etsi di statu' to qualify 'Clericis laicos' table description

[edit]

I suggest qualifying the 1296 clericis laicos description of financial prohibitions with the rescinding 1297 Etsi di statu -- both by Boniface VIII.

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Etsi_de_statu

Webistrator (talk) 03:49, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bulls and letters

[edit]

Should we split the list and make a new article for the ones that are actually just papal letters, not bulls? Or just rename this article and have two separate lists here? Adam Bishop (talk) 10:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One page would probably work for now, though we could potentially also split things up like "Documents of the Catholic Church" by century? --Elonka 21:56, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

inaccurate data?

[edit]

This is a PDF facsimile of bulls of Innocent IV. It contains a bull about Talmud but Lachrymabilem Judaeorum is NOT in it. http://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/01p/1243-1254,_SS_Innocentius_IV,_Bullarium_(Cherubini_vol_1_ff_109-130),_LT.pdf Further, Documenta Catholica Omnia does NOT list any document under that name. Please verify the name and date with Documenta Cathoplica Omnia. 71.163.117.143 (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your statement, Lachrymabilem Judaeorum appears as a bull for 3 popes;
An unlisted author pdf file that states Gregory IX issued Lachrymabilem Judaeorum[4]
  • Gregory X [5], published by Cambridge University, written by Magda Teter
  • Innocent IV: which it is called an Encyclical, not a bull, Lachrymabilem Judaeorum Alemannie [6], page 20, published by Woburn Press, edited by Cecil Roth.
Another website source stating Innocent IV.[7]
The Catholic Encyclopedia online, insinuates a papal bull issued by Innocent IV, but gives no name for this bull.[8]

A subsequent search of "Documenta Cathoplica Omnia" lists no mention of "Lachrymabilem Judaeorum, but there is an inference searching under "Innocent IV jews".[9] However, I am not convinced of that website's reliability. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:12, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Documenta Catholica is just scans of the Patrologia Latina, isn't it? It's reliable in that sense. For Innocent IV though his registers published by Elie Berger might be the better source (the first two volumes are on Google Books). Adam Bishop (talk) 21:36, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
More research: http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDFs/Roth%20Ritual%20Murder%20Libel%20JR.pdf is a paper which identifies Lachrymabilem Judeorum by Innocent IV as an ENCYCLICAL not a bull.71.163.117.143 (talk) 11:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I noted above (almost two years ago now) that there are a lot of simple papal letters on this list, not bulls - but of course, the distinction is often unknown to non-specialists. Adam Bishop (talk) 11:26, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
One more source, referenced in Cardinal Ganganelli's report: Simon Grayzel, The Church and the Jews in the XIIIth Century, at Hathi Trust, which gives both English and Latin; http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.32106017471241;view=1up;seq=282 71.163.117.143 (talk) 12:33, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, I am new to Wiki except as a daily user and very occasional corrector of my own entry. I am the Deputy Chairman of the Magna Carta Trust, and Chair the Magna Carta 800th Anniversary Commemoration Committee. My interest in Innocent III is the Papal Bull of 22 August 1215, in which the Magna Carta was declared null following King John's appeal to the Pope, and then resceneded in 1216 on the petition of King John's nine-year old son. Henry III, led by his Guardians, William Marshall, Earl of Pembroke, and the Papal Legate. This Bull seems to be missing from this list. Can that be corrected, or do I have my facts wrong?

Thank you.

72.22.138.90 (talk) 08:35, 18 December 2014 (UTC)Sir Robert Worcester rmworcester@yahoo.com[reply]

Papal bull of 1696?

[edit]

These two sources mention a papal bull that was issued in 1696;

  • "(...) while the family was still in Julfa, resulted in a papal bull of 1696, granting the family full citizenship of Rome and trading privileges in Rome and other cities." -- Aslanian, Sebouh; Berberian, Houri (2009). "SCERIMAN FAMILY". Encyclopaedia Iranica
  • "(...) starting in the 1680s while the family was still in Julfa, resulted in a papal bull of 1696, granting the family trading privileges in Rome, Ancona, Citavecchia, as well as full citizenship in Rome." -- Aslanian, Sebouh (2011). From the Indian Ocean to the Mediterranean: The Global Trade Networks of Armenian Merchants from New Julfa. University of California Press. p 160. ISBN 978-0520947573.

Couldn't find any further (proper) information and details about it, though. - LouisAragon (talk) 20:53, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So far, I have found no formal name for the bull. Will keep looking though. Also, I found a particular editor that might be of some assistance.[10] Couldn't hurt to ask. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
LouisAragon, I have Jzsj's talk page is on my watchlist so saw this there: neither of those sources look to be the type that would make the distinction between a bull or a brief and while there could be a formal bull, the sources also might just be saying the Holy See granted X family these rights using bull as shorthand for any grant from the Holy See. In other words, you might be searching for a named document that doesn't actually exist. It also very well could, but the mention of the phrase bull in fields outside of the historical study of early modern Christianity is used very broadly. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:55, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but I have no lead as to where to find this. My work doesn't include library research, just what comes up in Google search. @LouisAragon: Jzsj (talk) 19:40, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of papal bulls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Pascite Gregem Dei 2021

[edit]

The apostolic constitution Pascite Gregem Dei 2021 is issued as a bull and might be added. Nysius Isidorus (talk) 07:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_papal_bulls&oldid=1202730992"