Talk:List of paleoconservative organizations

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 September 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Business and Industrial Council

I can find no subtantiation for the claim that the USBIC is a paleoconservative organization. It appears to be a business-related lobby seeking a protectionist trade policy and does not take stands on issues of concern to paleoconservatives. Unless there is a rationale for keeping them on the list they should be removed.LAWinans (talk) 16:52, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Family Research Council is paleoconservative?

Since it "supports military action against radical Islam", how can it be considered paleoconservative? Paleo's are usually opposed to military action of any kind, except defense in the aftermath of a direct attack from an established power or organization, so it being "paleoconservative" is somewhat of a misnomer IMO.

Who knows? Since there are no sources for this article is appears that inclusion is based simply on the views of editors, aka original research. I'll start deleting unsourced entries next week. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 23:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the Family Research Council, in addition to other groups such as Accuracy in Academia and Eagle Forum do not belong in this article as they espouse social conservatism, not paleoconservatism. With regards, Anupam^Talk 18:15, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ludwig von Mises Institute

I removed this Institute from this list. It is clearly Libertarian and not paleoconservative.Bastiaan1942 (talk) 07:49, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]