Talk:List of open-source films

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm

Open (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen

Definition of "Open Source"

The term "open source" is a trademark of the Open Source Initative. Here is their definition of what it means: https://opensource.org/osd Most of the projects currently listed on this page do not qualify, either because of the use of CC license with a NonCommercial clause, or because sources are not available. I suggest this page be divided into two, one called something like "CreativeCommons films" or "Open content films", and one using the current title but only including projects that fit the Open Source Definition. --Danylstrype (talk) 09:26, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I second the above comment. Some of them are also under a non-derivatives license. This article is extremely misleading, since it is only a minority of the films listed that qualify as "open source". Maybe non-commercial films should go on their own separate list/article? Johnsu01 (talk) 17:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stray Cinema

Stray Cinema is listed as "Open Source Movie" "yes", but "CC License" of "by-nc-sa". I would think the NonCommercial clause would mean it is not an Open Source Movie. Lloydbudd (talk) 22:07, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indented line NonCommercial does not mean not Open Source. It is the same as in software, there is Open Source software that is being sold. Spiralciric (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

information about production-team, country is missing!!

The Last Drug

The Last Drug....seeing as it's almost 2011 right now, isn't a planned release of 2009 a bit ridiculous? Bustter (talk) 21:48, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Station to Station

After extensive search, I cannot find any verification that the Station to Station feature film or any of it's 62 shorts are open source, creative commons, or commercial reuse. Furthermore, the film is not not even available for free online viewing which again makes it very unlikely that this is open source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:420:4484:1254:C4A9:8:9441:56B2 (talk) 09:53, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Dead Gentlemen

Could the films/shows by The Dead Gentlemen(The Gamers, The Gamers 2: Dorkness Rising, Journey Quest, et.al) be considered under this category? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.185.45.237 (talk) 06:31, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ship of Theseus

Could anyone please confirm that 'Ship of Theseus' is actually CC-BY-4.0? I've found no source to corroborate this. KozRoss (talk) 06:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can't either. Not to mention the year of the film is wrong. I've removed it from the list. Opencooper (talk) 07:08, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

4232

Film-Short CC-BY-SA https://4232.cf/ https://4232.cf/prensa/ https://www.imdb.com/title/tt18345772/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2803:9800:9015:482E:264B:FEFF:FE7B:DDEA (talk) 22:33, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sintel

Is Sintel a good option for this list? Looks like https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Sintel lists it as CC Attribution? Ahlfi006 (talk) 21:14, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]