Talk:List of ochotonids

List of ochotonids is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

List of ochotonids is part of the Lagomorphs series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on January 19, 2024.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 12, 2022	Featured list candidate	Promoted
October 6, 2022	Featured topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured list

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Missing species

This list does not list the all 34 currently recognized species for Ochotona; see Pika#Species. --NGC 54 (talk｜contribs) 14:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@NGC 54: Correct, they don't match- this list follows the guidelines of WP:MAMMAL that we start with the species listed in Mammal Species of the World 3rd ed. (2005), and then add/remove species where both the IUCN and ASM agree. The Pika list does not do this; for example it has the Flat-headed pika, O. flatcalvariam, but that's not in MSW or recognized by the IUCN, just ASM. So, it's not that this list is missing 5 species, it's that Pika has 5 species that it shouldn't. --Pres N 14:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]