Talk:List of municipalities of Norway
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Standardization of the lists of municipalities
[edit]There is a discussion about an eventual standardization of all the lists of municipalities. Please join here and express your opinions.--Húsönd 19:55, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
What about a list over the ten largest municipalities by area? Kautokeino is the largest.Orcaborealis 16:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- This is the way to do it. Rank and colours! Hogne 16:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- I am currently working on it. See User:Punkmorten/Municipalities of Norway. Punkmorten 12:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Using maps
[edit]03-Sep-2007: Various maps are needed (in articles such as "Municipalities of Norway"); however, keep maps small because not every user needs to see a map, and most articles are repeatedly edited by local people who don't need a map at all. One month ago (3-August-2007), a large blank outline map of Norway's municipalities was centered at the top section of the article, but I reduced the map, merging into the top text, one month later. Maps are needed for major cities and ranking areas by region size, etc. -Wikid77 08:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Formatting maps-images
[edit]03-Sep-2007: Many people are asked to edit articles, without an intro session explaining formatting of images + text. An image reference ("[[Image:mypic|right|thumb|170px|My caption]]") can have screen placement "right" or "left" or "center" to control text-wrapping alongside the image. When tall, vertical navigation-boxes appear in an article, using image-parameter "left" will allow text to wrap between the image and the righthand nav-box; however, standard Wiki format tends to avoid squeezing text between images, so try to keep side images very small (such as 170px) when wrapping text along a nav-box. When placing map images in an article, there is a tendency to want the map large to cross-reference against the text; however, maps can be a nuisance to experts who don't even need the map at all, so embed maps as smaller images and allow "click to enlarge" as a separate window, for other users to switch between the article & map windows for cross-checking. Putting giant maps in an article can be less informative than encouraging side-by-side windows of article against click-enlarged maps, as a technique of cross-referencing data against a map. Outsiders who've never seen the map might prefer a giant map, but balance that against local people who don't need such maps at all, and keep maps as "click to enlarge" smaller size. -Wikid77 08:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Commune 1123 is missing
[edit]I found in some data commune 1123 with the same data as 1122 => Gjesdal. There has been an administrative change? Anybody can confirm that 1122 is the same with 1123? --Valugi (talk) 12:09, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of municipalities of Norway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/66vivrxC3?url=http://www.ks.no/System/Siden-finnes-ikke/?aspxerrorpath=%2Ftemplates%2FPage.aspx to http://www.ks.no/templates/Page.aspx?id=46423
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:26, 29 November 2017 (UTC)