This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles
I'll be saying this at WP:FLC as well: I concede that Canada doesn't have a monopoly on forest inventories ... so if someone wants to propose and defend alternative inventories, I have no problem with that. I'd prefer to keep the current page title, but as a fall-back position, if necessary, the page could have a title that focuses only on Canada's national forest inventory of native trees. - Dank (push to talk) 19:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are two things that people may ask for at WP:FLC that I'm going to resist (strongly): descriptions and pests, which the sources call "damaging agents". Each article for these trees has a description section that's almost always named "Description" and almost always the first section in the article; see for instance Picea sitchensis#Description. Clearly, that's not something that could be successfully and accurately summarized to fit into the space allotted here. There's so much to say about "damaging agents" that I'm going to do a separate list for that, focused to some extent on the agents rather than the trees. - Dank (push to talk) 16:07, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is the raw data (public domain, as always) on growth requirements from the the USDA Plants database, copied yesterday. I'm listing this because it's possible people will want to organize the data in some different way in the future. - Dank (push to talk) 13:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]