Jump to content

Talk:List of fusion experiments

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Is the separation of torroidal "correct"? I don't think it's the shape that's important, but the method used to confine the plasma. I'm thinking of re-arranging this into "Magnetic confinement", making all of the existing entries in torroids as sections within. This would also allow entries for mirror devices and other schemes, which are currently (and obviously) missing. We also seem to need a section for electrostatic devices like the fence and such, and one for pinch devices as well. Maury 12:49, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The "Toroidal machine" section is actually a subsection of "Magnetic confinement" already. Mirror devices and others are missing, so feel free to add examples in new or existing subsections appropriately. Thanks, --Gabbec 03:05, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not clear whether this list is only to include academic and/or research projects, but it seems the following might be added somewhere:
+ Lawrenceville Plasma Physics, Focus Fusion/DPF
+ Helion Energy, Inductive Plasmoid Accelerator (IPA)/Fusion Engine, FRC-sourced plasma collider
+ General Fusion, magnetized target fusion (unclear how much of the project physically exists)
+ Tri Alpha Energy, hybrid Migma FRC approach (reportedly well funded, but operating in stealth mode)
+ Electron Power Systems, spheromak/Electron Spiral Toroid collider (still soliciting funding, unclear how much of the project physically exists)
+ Magneto-Inertial Fusion Technologies, Inc. (MIFTI), staged Z-pinch (based on research originally conducted at the University of California, Irvine)
+ CrossFire Fusion Reactor or Magnetic and Electrostatic Nuclear Fusion Reactor
+ Bee Research, Sesselmann Tube Accelerator Reactor (STAR)/IEC
+ FPGeneration, Multiple Ambipolar Recirculating Ion Beam Experiment (MARBLE)
Krellkraver (talk) 03:09, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lockheed Martin Compact Fusion Reactor is another one missing from the list. I don't think it's fully built, but perhaps this article needs a section for works in progress. Hadron137 (talk) 01:00, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LENR?

[edit]

Is there any particular reason why the multitude of LENR experiments (MIT, NASA, Osaka University, DARPA, Navy SPAWAR, (Navy) NRL, Andrea Rossi, etc) aren't even given mention here as an experiment? Barwick (talk) 13:52, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bueller? Anybody? If you don't have any opposition, I'll work on putting together a short writeup about LENR experiments. Barwick (talk) 15:06, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KMS?

[edit]

Is there any particular reason why the KMS Fusion experiments aren't even given mention here as an experiment? They were the first to achieve fusion in the lab!? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.136.29.223 (talk) 20:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PLT, PDX

[edit]

The TFTR article notes that its predecessors at Princeton were the Princeton Large Torus (PLT) and the Poloidal Diverter Experiment (PDX), which I imagine we should add to this list when good sources can be cited. (A quick scan of the PPPL Website didn't find any historical pages sufficiently detailed to mention those devices.) 50.181.30.121 (talk) 23:51, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of fusion experiments. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of fusion experiments. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on List of fusion experiments. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:14, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inertial hypervelocity impact / shockwave fusion research

[edit]

I don't see a reference here to the First Light Fusion research into using shockwaves from "hypervelocity" impacts (think railguns) into shaped targets containing a D-T mix. Would this project be of relevance here? From their press releases: "Following more than six months of investigation addressing factors including tritium breeding, corrosion rates and compatible steels, researchers at UKAEA concluded that, fundamentally, the concept is viable."

ThomasNichols (talk) 23:52, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The image is now replaced by one with CC-BY-2.0. --Geek3 (talk) 11:59, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:22, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tokamak 3 and Tokamak 4

[edit]

I think Tokamak 3 closed in 1969 and Tokamak 4 closed in 1978 but I can't find a site proving this. I have the following sources https://www.iter.org/newsline/102/1401 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2017.0446 and https://quillette.com/2022/02/21/fusion-power-is-coming/ and https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978FizPl...4.1211I/abstract

I will add these values if this is valid but I don't want to have unsourced claims that Tokamak 3 closed in 1969. ScientistBuilder (talk) 21:34, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]