Talk:List of formations in American football

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 June 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	American football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject American football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of American football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.American footballWikipedia:WikiProject American footballTemplate:WikiProject American footballAmerican football articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹ The template below (WikiProject National Football League) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

National Football League High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The single wing, the spread (or shotgun), and are they the same?

This is, IMO, an issue of language, and how people use it, and not so much an issue of the real formations involved. So let me see if I can lay it out as best I can.

1. If you're the kind of person who uses "single wing" to denote all the formations that involve a pass from center to the tailback, and do not distinguish between the various old formations, then the single wingback is a shotgun, or spread formation.

2. If you're the kind of person who thinks the single wingback is one formation, the double wingback is another formation, the short punt is yet another formation, and that spreads of various kinds may be a double wingback but may not be, then what you're going to say is that the shotgun is a descendant of the spread. This is an argument that will never leave the Wikipedia and will always be in the hands of the last opinionated editor to touch it.

I personally am in category 2. I'll note that the coaches of the time, in the books of the time (Bible's 1947 text, Don Faurot's book on the Split T, even Jones and Wilkinson's 1957 text) didn't treat these offenses as the same. The coaching texts of the time show very different defenses for the single wing as opposed to the spread.^[1]^[2] They did not lump all these defenses in one grand bucket. The single wing was a power running formation. Double wings and spreads were passing formations. They seem as different to me as apples and oranges, and to the extent the Wikipedia cannot accommodate the differing points of view, it does a disservice to everyone. Dwmyers (talk) 18:32, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

pro set

This may be a generational thing, but I most associate the pro set with Vince Lombardi (Giants, Packers, etc). Dwmyers (talk) 21:13, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

4-3

4-3 inventor is really up in the air historically, take your pick of any number of teams that experimented with it. Tom Landry is often credited as the inventor as he was the first to use it as his base defense. Dwmyers (talk) 21:13, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Double Wing

The discussion is entirely modern and ignores history. I've been reading biographies of Sammy Baugh, and TCU back in the 1930s used it extensively under Dutch Meyer. To claim Don Markham "invented" the double wing is historical nonsense, as Sammy at TCU with Meyer were using the formation before Don Markham was born. Dwmyers (talk) 11:52, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To Add

"T-Wing" formation, created and first used by Otto D. Unruh in 1938 (source in article).

References

^ see Faurot's separate chapters for single wing defense (21) and spread defense (22). Secrets of the "Split-T" formation, Prentice-Hall, 1950
^ See Jones and Wilksonson's separate chapters on single wing defense (16) and spread defense (17), Modern Defensive Football, Prentice-Hall, 1957

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of formations in American football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:47, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"V formation (American football)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect V formation (American football) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 2#V formation (American football) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Invalid ^OS _talk 13:09, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Schwede66 talk 06:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that when Oklahoma City University played the Southwestern Moundbuilders in 1941, their offense wore lettered uniforms that spelled victory, but still lost 7-0? Source: https://fultonhistory.com/newspaper%2011/New%20York%20Evening%20Post/New%20York%20NY%20Evening%20Post%201941%20Grayscale/New%20York%20NY%20Evening%20Post%201941%20Grayscale%20-%204438.pdf
- Reviewed:

Created by RedSquirrel12 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:09, 1 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/List of formations in American football; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

List of formations in American football is neither new nor recently expanded in size by five times. Please read the DYK guidelines. Schwede 66 04:53, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

5-6 Defense

In the '70s, the Minnesota Vikings ran a 3rd down defense called the 5-6 defense with five down linemen and 6 defensive backs. If anyone has any references, it probably should be added to this article. 74.98.11.80 (talk) 15:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] see Faurot's separate chapters for single wing defense (21) and spread defense (22). Secrets of the "Split-T" formation, Prentice-Hall, 1950

[2] See Jones and Wilksonson's separate chapters on single wing defense (16) and spread defense (17), Modern Defensive Football, Prentice-Hall, 1957

[1]

[2]