Talk:List of expeditions of Muhammad/Vote

This page will be used to discuss and vote on the proposal put forward by Eperoton (talk · contribs) for the List of expeditions of Muhammad.

The proposal can be found here.

Vote

Change the article's title

To something like "List of expeditions under Muhammad" or "List of early Muslim expeditions" to allow the inclusion of non-military expeditions (reconnaissance missions?).

Neutral. Al-Andalusi (talk) 20:12, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - You can make a separate article for that. Xtremedood (talk) 02:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The use of Watt's table as the basis for including/excluding expeditions

Neutral. I think any reliable reference will do. Al-Andalusi (talk) 20:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of the "Muhammad's order and reason for expedition" column

Support. Al-Andalusi (talk) 20:12, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The conflicts are often too complex to be summed up in one sentence or a few sentences. This should be left for the individual articles to deal with the complex matters. Other lists such as List of World War I battles and List of World War II battles do not include such information. Not to mention that the current version contains a lot of primary sources and misattributed sources. Xtremedood (talk) 02:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of the "Casualties description" column

Support. Al-Andalusi (talk) 20:12, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - once again, this should be left for the individual articles, which should deal with the complexities involved in each expedition. Xtremedood (talk) 02:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

A proposal should be whether or not the old version should be kept. Why is there not that option here? Rigged from the beginning. --Misconceptions2 (talk) 22:19, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That would be opposing all suggested changes. Btw, you must be dreaming if you think that "your version" (the one you mindlessly copied from wikiislam.net) will remain as is. Al-Andalusi (talk) 01:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wont at all get involved with this rigged vote. I urge others not to either. --Misconceptions2 (talk) 02:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, your accusations are not justified. Personal attacks don't bring about effective dialogue. Xtremedood (talk) 05:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]