Jump to content

Talk:List of equipment of the Bangladesh Army/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Equipment of the Bangladesh Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:38, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

About Zil-131

Zil-137 is actually a wheeled train attached to Zil-131.Sorry for the mistake. https://www.trucksplanet.com/catalog/model.php?id=2130

Confirmation about existence of Type 65/74 & ZPU-4 needed

Can anyone confirm if Type 65/74 & ZPU-4 anti-aircraft guns are in current inventory of Bangladesh Army?References from reliable sources will be hepful.

About 300 New Type-59 Tanks

@103.92.160.22 Testing tanks[1] doesn't mean they are in active service.After testing the army will decide if they will add it to their inventory or not.So your addition of 300 tanks in the list is not valid.The list will be updated when only if the army officially announces about including these tanks in their inventory. AzfarShams ,20:58, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

References

  1. ^ Syed Amar Khan (2019-08-30). "Bangladesh Army tests indigenously upgraded Durjoy tanks". Bangladesh. Retrieved 2019-09-02.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:23, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Wrong image in wrong place

The image showed as FN-16 matches the description of QW-2 Vanguard 2.Visit this link, you'll understand what am I saying.

Changing the image of Heckler & Koch HK21

@Mr. Samerkov, you recently tried to change the image of Heckler & Koch HK21. Both were image of the same thing. One with ammunition belt other one without it. Changing them seems unnecessary to me. Can you please explain the reason? You're free to change, if you have valid reason. Otherwise, I will advise you not to change anything at your personal whim. Your previous revision was undone. If you think I made a mistake, leave a message here.--AzfarShams, my talkpage, 08:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Nope, It was you should knoe that We Need a Background. Now Most of Picture dosen't need To shoe Magazine or not. This one is much much better than Your Version. Don't let it happen like Peruvian Army.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 09:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

@Mr. Samerkov First of all, you need to look after your English spelling. And what do you mean by "my version"? Neither I took the photo nor added it.--AzfarShams, my talkpage, 08:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Yes, My English Might not Good as you are but you on the other hand. Always think that Something is better. No matter Right or wrong. Please follow the White Background. Magazine Does not Nessesary !. Mr. Samerkov (talk) 15:32, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:14, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)