Talk:List of educational institutions in Faridabad

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India: Haryana / Education Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Haryana (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Education in India workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Cleanup

Arjayay Should the non-referenced non linked institutions not be deleted. Further, why red links? Create page first, then add link. Also add link to the specific institute, not the whole society. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 14:44, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Although I agree with "No article = No inclusion" unfortunately this is not a set Wikipedia standard.

In some schools articles e.g. List of schools in Nigeria this is enforced, (but if you look at the edit page of that article you can see how many reversions I have to do to enforce this)
In some other articles schools who can show they are notable by adding reliable, independent, sources are included. In some others a link to the Schools web-site is sufficient.
In most schools articles e.g. List of schools in the Gambia there is no such rule.

One problem is that, under Wikipedia's guidelines, all Secondary Schools and Further Education Colleges/Universities are deemed to be "Notable". I think that, with about 1 Million such schools world-wide, and schools articles being among the most vandalized, that is a mistake, but that is policy.

We can propose an inclusion criteria for this article, and if it has not been objected to in say, 30 days, can implement it, as being as consensus.
As for linking schools that are part of an institute, this is more difficult - do we really want/need an article on every single school?
I don't think so, especially if there is a central article explaining what the principals, be they religious, teaching methods, or whatever, are.
It is useful to link to such an article as the reader can then see what the guiding policies/ideas of the school are. - Arjayay (talk) 15:19, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you deleted the schools like SOS which have their own Wikipedia page Arjayay -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 14:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake Capankajsmilyo I transferred them to a spreadsheet to sort them A to Z, but those after Ma in the original list were not transferred - thanks for pointing that out - Arjayay (talk) 14:56, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]