Jump to content

Talk:List of drawing topics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Major rename proposal of certain "lists" to "outlines"

[edit]

See Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Major rename proposal of certain "lists" to "outlines".

The Transhumanist 01:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to

[edit]

See the proposal at the Village pump

The Transhumanist 09:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guidelines for outlines

[edit]

Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.

Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.

The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "History of" section needs links!

[edit]

Please add some relevant links to the history section.

Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates. Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.

The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested admin move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was move. Jubilee♫clipman 23:38, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Outline of drawingList of basic drawing topics — Revert controversial rename, part of a mass campaign by the transhumanist. The original name is descriptive and unambiguous, whereas the "outline" name is a very bad pun, ambiguous (a discussion of outline drawings? Something else?), not a common term in wikipedia or without, and doesn't follow the least surprise naming doctrine. Surely the drawing article provides "an outline" (summary). A list is not a summary (see the OED). Verbal chat 07:25, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should there be a centralised discussion about the names of these "outline" articles as a whole, rather than move just one? The arguments here apply to all these articles, in the main. Knepflerle (talk) 22:56, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed that's why they should be moved back pending consensus. This one is done now. Verbal chat 23:05, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

I oppose the move. There are too few editors engaged here to call it consensus therefore I'm reverting to status quo. -- penubag  (talk) 00:27, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The original name was a list. Until the situation is resolved it should remain a list. Verbal chat 19:24, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I also oppose the move - and have moved it back since it lacks consensus. The Transhumanist 03:28, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Verbal, I agree that the title "Outline of drawing" is awkward and is pun-like. So on second thought, I've fixed this by renaming the page to "Outline of drawing topics", which conforms to the "topics" convention of the name you favor, while clearly indicating this article's association or relation to the collection of outlines on Wikipedia, the format of which this page shares. The Transhumanist 03:31, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TT, you are truly devious and disruptive. You have moved this twice, thus blocking a restoration to the original title, which would have solved the problem. Why the obsession with the word "outline"? Get a life and stop this disruption. -- Brangifer (talk) 05:20, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Straw poll and discussion concerning what outlines should be called

[edit]

A discussion is underway that may affect the name of this article.

See: Wikipedia talk:Outlines#Should articles named "Outline of x" be renamed to "List of x topics"?

The Transhumanist 04:35, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]