Talk:List of defunct United States congressional committees

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) thing(s).

Please help improve this article

There are a lot of redlinks here. Below are several resources that could be helpful in creating new article to fill in the blanks for these historical committees. Please add any you may find useful.DCmacnut <> 21:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Web Resources

Congressional Research Service reports: http://www.opencrs.com/ and http://www.wikileaks.org/
National Archives and Records Administration: House of Representatives and Senate legislative guides
Chairmen of Senate Standing Committees 1789-present, United States Senate Historical Office. November 2006.
House and Senate Journals, 1789-1875 via the Library of Congress American Memory Project
Committee history documents for modern committees, via official committee websites.

Books

Byrd, Robert C. The Senate: 1789-1989 Historical Statistics 1789-1992. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1992
Canon, David T., Garrison Nelson, and Charles Stewart III. Committees in the U.S. Congress: 1789-1946. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2002.
Galloway, George Barnes. History of the House of Representatives. Crowell, 1962.
Haynes, George Henry. The Senate of the United States: Its History and Practice. Russell & Russell, 1960
Nelson, Garrison. Committees in the U.S. Congress: 1947-1992. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1993.
Stubbs, Walter. Congressional Committees, 1789-1982: A Checklist. Greenwood Press, 1985

Defunct Committees

Moved from User talk:Markles § Defunct Committees

User:Markles, as you know, I'm working on updating the list of defunct congressional committees. As I work on the list, I'm using Water Stubbs Congressional Committees 1789-1982: A Checklist, but I'm realizing that his work, while comprehensive, is far from accurate. For several committee records, he overlooks the 1909 resolution that made all Senate select committees de-facto standing committees and continues listing them as select after that date. Also, he took liberties in shortening committee names, particularly those committees whose lengthy names derived from the resolution that created them. To make the list readable, it seems to make sense to me to list committees based on their primary subject matter, rather than any modifiers as examine, study, investigate, and so on. For that, Stubbs provides some abbreviations in his book, many of which work. For other committees eliminating the modifiers alters the purpose of the committee. For the sake of simplicity, I'm leaning toward an abbreviated name for the committee if it makes sense, mainly to make alphabetizing simpler and giving shorter article names. For example the Select Committee on the Banks Expedition is a shortened form of the official name Select Committee to Inquire and Report in Regard to the Chartering of Transport Vessels for the Banks Expedition. I'd include the official title in the notes field to eliminate confusion. Or do you think I should use the official title as the article name and alphabetize accordingly (under "inquire" in this case rather than under "banks")?

Another area I've run into trouble are two related select committees, the Admission of California established January 24, 1849[1] and the "Committee of Thirteen" established April 18-19, 1850[2][3], which ultimately lead to the Compromise of 1850. Stubbs lists the first, but not the second committee. Instead, he lists the California Committee as running until Sept. 30, 1850, overlapping the time of the Committee of Thirteen. My best guess is he is considering them both the same committee, since they both dealt with California. But the Thirteen committee also addressed other issues directly, like the Texas border and slavery[4][5]. Also, the California committee had 7 members, and the Thirteen, obviously had 13 members, and neither committee shared any members. I can't be certain Stubbs means to count both as one committee, since he states in his book that he left out a lot of "minor" committees, such as housekeeping or ceremonial issues. I wouldn't count this Thirteen Committee as minor, though, and I'm reluctant to leave it out because it was a major player in crafting major legislation. Also, the creation of this committee directly lead to Senator Foote's attempted assault on Senator Benton. The committee created to investigate the "disorder of the Senate" is listed as a separate committee in Stubbs, leading me to believe he is counting the California and Thirteen as one and the same.

I'm leaning to counting them as separate committees, with the termination dates as the end of their respective sessions of Congress, and making a notation to the discrepancy in the Stubbs book. What do you think?Dcmacnut 18:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thinks the shorter/clearer name should be used for the page title with the longer name used in the introductory sentence.
Water Stubbs's work is very good & useful for you, but it is not definitive. WP should go by official House/Senate rules but still note other people's contribution. Thus I concur with your idea of counting them as separate and including a notation to Stubbs.—Markles 19:08, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of defunct United States congressional committees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100910020425/http://www.house.gov/house/CommitteeWWW.shtml to http://www.house.gov/house/CommitteeWWW.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:02, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]