Jump to content

Talk:List of collections of Crusader sources

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Primary sources

[edit]

This list has great potential, but currently does not comply with WP:PRIMARY. References to primary sources themselves (WP:SELF) do not establish their notability, nor their relevance for inclusion in the list.

  • Per WP:LOW, Complete lists of works, appropriately sourced to reliable scholarship (WP:V), are encouraged.
  • Per WP:BIB, It should be possible to verify that each entry in a bibliography meets the inclusion criteria. If an entry has a Wikipedia article, merely wikilinking it to the article verifies it because the reader can navigate to the article and determine if the entry meets the inclusion criteria. If an entry does not have a Wikipedia article and there might be any doubt that it belongs in the bibliography, it should be cited with a reliable source that verifies its relevance.

I think this is a fixable problem. All that needs to happen is referring to a reliable secondary source which identifies a particular work as a 'Crusader source collection'. I'm sure such reliable secondary sources exist. Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 17:36, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]