Talk:List of canonically crowned images

Catholicism Low‑importance

List of canonically crowned images is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Section sizes

Section size for List of canonically crowned images (58 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	2,997	2,997
Pontifically crowned Marian images	40	355,651
Algeria	794	794
Andorra	1,718	1,718
Argentina	13,625	13,625
Austria	2,750	2,750
Belarus	5,363	5,363
Belgium	8,831	8,831
Bolivia	1,914	1,914
Brazil	15,020	15,020
Canada	2,919	2,919
Chile	4,948	4,948
China	494	494
Colombia	14,278	14,278
Costa Rica	1,418	1,418
Croatia	2,831	2,831
Cuba	1,500	1,500
Czech Republic	3,907	3,907
Dominican Republic	620	620
Ecuador	5,006	5,006
El Salvador	825	825
France	46,131	46,131
Germany	5,818	5,818
Guatemala	2,999	2,999
India	1,208	1,208
Ireland	715	715
Italy	75	75
Japan	1,335	1,335
Kuwait	830	830
Lithuania	2,204	2,204
Luxembourg	1,418	1,418
Malta	9,167	9,167
Mexico	32,712	32,712
The Netherlands	3,660	3,660
Nicaragua	1,755	1,755
Panama	976	976
Paraguay	936	936
Peru	6,454	6,454
Philippines	42,800	42,800
Poland	77	77
Portugal	3,443	3,443
Puerto Rico	1,830	1,830
Slovakia	985	985
Slovenia	1,006	1,006
Spain	71,473	71,473
Sri Lanka	1,614	1,614
Switzerland	3,343	3,343
Taiwan (Republic of China)	1,180	1,180
Turkey	501	501
Ukraine	5,859	5,859
United Kingdom	1,115	1,115
United States of America	4,428	4,428
Uruguay	758	758
Venezuela	8,045	8,045
Pontifically crowned Christological images	8,109	8,109
Pontifically crowned Josephian images	9,396	9,396
References	28	28
Notes	242	242
Total	376,423	376,423

Please do not speculate on future events

Per WP:CRYSTAL, we may not add future events to articles before they actually happen. I have removed about three future "coronations" due to violations. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 22:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mexico: 'Marian or Josephian'

Why 'or Josephian'? All the images are Nuestra Senora, Our Lady, or Virgen.--2607:FEA8:D5DF:F3D9:75FD:9C5:E8BC:345A (talk) 19:48, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent changings

Dear iP 2603:8000:2A03:9DF9:E8D9:8213:86DE:491:, 2603:8000:2A03:9DF9:8595:B537:FB25:D787 (and future various) what is the point in your changings, for example from (correct) English to Spanish, if the Spanish is spelt all wrong? Luzifernam: what is the point in changing correct spelling into something other? Both(?) of you produce a lot of work which has to be fixed by others. What is the point in such statements [1]?

I am not interested in an edit war, but I will change back at least Canòlich back to the appropriate spelling. --Medusahead (talk) 10:24, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

I just blocked 2603:8000:2A42:AE98:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) for a long history of disruptive edits: copyright violations (see the notices above), an almost complete lack of explanations and edit summaries, and when there's an edit summary it's often weird and rude. I see now, from a note by Medusahead, that such edits have been made from this range for years now. I'll also ping User:Da Boauss Ss, who's dealt with the IP's edits. IP, you don't seem to have much interest in talk page discussion, but I'm telling you, this kind of stuff is unacceptable. Drmies (talk) 00:39, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: with 2603:8000:2A00:0:0:0:0:0/41 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), it goes back to December 2020, maybe 4,000 edits--unless I lost count. Drmies (talk) 00:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Im just thankful I didn’t lose my patience with that guy. He was annoying. Tysm. Da Boauss Ss (talk) 04:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you very much, Drmies, this one of x IPs was really getting tedious. --Medusahead (talk) 10:32, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - No problem, Da Boauss Ss and Medusahead. They just evaded their block again from another IP, which I blocked for three months. If it continues, we might have to semi-protect this and other articles. Please ping me if you see them at work. Drmies (talk) 15:24, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article is too long to read and navigate comfortably.

According to Special:LongPages, this article is the 3rd largest at ~662k bytes. I looked at the section sizes and saw that Italy is the largest section at ~205k bytes, which is one massive table. I suggest that the article is split such that the Italy section has its own article, with the table split by century. I believe this will make the article easier to read and navigate. Any thoughts? zsteve21 (talk) 15:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! Yes, I don’t see why not. As long as this page may be navigated comfortably by our readers. Same thing has been done with List of Catholic basilicas, with Italy and Germany having their own respective articles. It should somehow shorten this since this a page this long also takes up some time to load. Da Boauss Ss (talk) 00:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]