Talk:List of birds of Portugal

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Portugal High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Birds Low‑importance

List of birds of Portugal is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Number of bird species in Portugal

There are much more than 474 bird species in Portugal. Have a look:

http://www.flickr.com/groups/aves_de_portugal/discuss/72157602211912042/

I hope it was of any help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.174.37.200 (talk) 00:52, 2 September 2008 (UTC) The same mistake is still here on wikipedia. It keeps giving 474 species of birds... The author of this wikipedia is portuguese and someone with knowledge about this area? Because, I don´t know why, a brasilian with a low knowledge about portuguese climatology did updates on the wikipedia page about Portugal, fortunately only on the portuguese version... I´m wondering why this sudden interest about a foreign country, along with a shameful lack of knowledge is taking place on information pages of wikipedia. There´s some kind of juri on wikipedia to evaluate/edit these kind of childish mistakes? More surprisingly some parts of wikipedia which include very gross errors ( like on this one) are impossible to edit, even if someone presents realistic sources. The reason: «it´s against vandalism». Well the vandalism is already done and the true vandals have been opening pages about things that they don´t know and prevent the people of science and truth to edit it. At least there are more wikipedia versions that show us the truth, to show everyone the reality. And fortunately a new Atlas is about to come with much more species which hopefully will represent correctly all the recent findings. On the year 2009 there were reported more species ( new species for Portugal). Each year there are more and more findings to add. Portugal stretches to Azores and Madeira, including the fact that the continent it´s between Europe and Africa which gives a excellent number of bird species. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.174.37.202 (talk) 00:28, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 31, 2020 revision

This revision changes the article's primary source from Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves (SPEA) to iGoTerra because the former no longer posts a full list on its website. The changes are:

Delete species in Categories D (doubts as to wild origin) and E (introduced but not established) for consistency with most other national lists.
Add three families and eight species per iGoTerra.
Delete a family and 37 species per iGoTerra.
Add Category S (status to be updated) and revise occurrence of (A) and (I) tags per iGoTerra.
Revise a name and erroneous sequences of species per Clements.
Update population status per Avibase.
Revise references, counts, and text to reflect the above.

Craigthebirder (talk) 13:58, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]