Talk:List of ambassadors of Australia to Sweden

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal List of ambassadors of Australia to Sweden is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

List table format

While I dont oppose consolidating the list into one sortable table, this change makes reading really confusing, especially with how the non-resident offices are listed. I would prefer the existing system of having note letters after the name or the title listing the non-resident ambassador offices. The early trade commissioners/charges should be at the top of the list, not the bottom, as they were the first holders.Siegfried Nugent (talk) 11:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Siegfried Nugent: Thanks. I hear your point and while my initial attempt was a tad clumsy, there is some merit in having just one list with columns that clearly identify title of office, location of officeholder and any other office held concurrently. I can see no clear reason why tables should be broken down in seperate tables UNLESS there are officeholders whose period in office overlap with other officeholders; then it can be confusing. If the flow is sequential, one table should suffice. I have WP:BOLD edited on the basis of other edits made to Australian diplomatic posts, where there appears to be no significant opposition to this common sense approach. We do need to find a solution for those lists where the period in office overlaps. Thanks. Rangasyd (talk) 04:56, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]