Talk:List of active United Kingdom military aircraft

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of active United Kingdom military aircraft article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Protector drone

Can someone please add the protector drone to the list of RAF aircraft. The template is confusing and I don't know how to do it. https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/first-new-british-protector-drone-arrives-on-uk-soil RAFRegtRockApe (talk) 03:44, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More organised and easy to find list of aircraft

Currently the lists of aircraft on this page are generally muddled together regardless of things like their role and purpose. Wouldn't it look more tidy and make aircraft easier to find if aircraft are split in their own sections on the list, like combat aircraft, trainers, transport/tanker aircraft, helicopters etc. For example if you view the history of the list layout from say back in 2010 the aircaft listed are in their own respective categorised sections. Twistyoak (talk) 17:53, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think what is already a number of small lists needs to be split further. If you are that intersted in roles then you can easily sort by the role coloumn. MilborneOne (talk) 18:18, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

F-35B numbers

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pictures-uks-second-f-35b-squadron-arrives-at-marh-459722/

This news - ukdefencejounral is a blog site - article says 17 not 18 so far as of July 2019.

BlueD954 (talk) 08:35, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures?

Why were the pictures that used to accompany the list removed? For example on the older revisions from roughly 5+ years ago there was a picture of the aircraft alongside the name, type, quantity etc for example. If there is no reason why not wouldn't it be better to expand the page more with pictures and make it look less blank and basic with pictures of the aircraft instead of just a muddled list. Twistyoak (talk) 01:56, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

154 new aircraft order

an order of 154 new aircraft has been placed by RAF command as of the 8th march 2023, these will be obtained to meet the delays in the tempest programme and to facilitate the need for maritime security and nato joint operational status.

I can see/find no substantial supporting evidence of this. If the RAF were ordering such a big new quantity of Typhoons (more than doubling the current inventory), it would be all over the news, and would be being spoken about by govt ministers.

Please remove the erroneous entry, or provide substantial support/evidence that it is indeed happening. 86.16.220.71 (talk) 10:36, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]