Talk:List of accolades received by Brokeback Mountain

List of accolades received by Brokeback Mountain is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 13, 2015	Featured list candidate	Promoted

Film: Awards

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Film awards task force.

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Format

I think all this info will be more neater in table form or similar... --Charlie Huang 【正矗昊】 12:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

The practice of vandalism in Wikipedia articles is not limited to inserting jokes, but also includes deletion of whole sections of information, without some prior warning, discussion, and concensus. Such deletion of sections of information is called "blanking" and is very frequent, perhaps because it is much easier to delete a section (or revert to a prior version), rather than to add new detailed information.

In this article, the new section "See also" has been blanked multiple times, under the guise of nonconformance to the strictest of Wikipedia format standards; however, such blanking is still pure vandalism, even if disguised by elaborate excuses. The correct approach is to establish a warning notice for other editors, open a dialogue, and try to reach a concensus before deleting whole sections from an article, especially if those sections are new, which further amplifies the extreme level of the vandalism. -Wikid77 17:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

31-May-2006: I have been trying to get improvements into this article for the past 24 hours, but on 3 separate occasions, user Melchoir has refused to allow a top-note line above the article in the form of a standard hatnote: "This article is about USE1, for USE2, see PAGE2" (allowed by Wikipedia guidelines). At this point, I have abandoned adding the hatnote: I cannot afford to waste any more time by user Melchoir vandalizing the article to remove added information (in legitimate format). Yes, it has been 24 hours fighting to get a simple hatnote & "See-also" section added to this article, to match the format of the other articles about Brokeback Mountain. No wonder the information about that film has been so hollow on Wikipedia: people are actively fighting to vandalize sections and kill added information. -Wikid77 02:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This whole article is cobblers; it's just a list of facts that are already listed in other articles about the movie on wp, some wholesale lifting of quotations, and a bit of unsubstantiated opinionating. I feel it should be deleted, or massively edited/rewritten. SpaceyHopper 10:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This should be incorporated into the main Brokeback Mountain article

That page already has a section devoted to the movie's critical reception, and a section for awards and nominations. Why the separate page? Nizamarain 15:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Agree - shouldn't this article be "List of Brokeback Mountain awards"? Because that's how it reads. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 16:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The current Brockeback Mountain article seems to cover most of this, I don't think this comprehensive list and separate page are necessary. Bro2baseball (talk) 22:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Almost Famous which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 17:46, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of accolades received by Almost Famous which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 01:01, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of accolades received by Brokeback Mountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://theenvelope.latimes.com/awards/oscars/env-turan5mar05%2C0%2C5359042.story
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101112231205/http://www.theasc.com/asc_news/awards/awards_history.php to http://www.theasc.com/asc_news/awards/awards_history.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150512181500/http://www.wga.org/wga-awards/previous-nominees-winners.aspx to http://www.wga.org/wga-awards/previous-nominees-winners.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:21, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of accolades received by Brokeback Mountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:02, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]