Talk:List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 737

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 737-100/200 was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 17 January 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 737. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 737. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing important 737 accident

Does anyone know why the USAir Flight 427 accident (September 8, 1994) is not included in this list? The NTSB investigation of that one finally revealed it was a faulty PCU which caused the crash, as well as some other previous crashes and near crashes. The 1991 UAL Colorado Springs crash, was reopened and revised to state the probable cause was a defective PCU, as a result of the USAir Flight 427 investigation. EditorASC (talk) 13:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tel USAir Flight 427 has been in this article for at least a year, probably longer. MilborneOne (talk) 13:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much. I got in too much of a hurry and looked in the wrong section. EditorASC (talk) 19:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Approaching airport to land

Why are so many of these when the plane was approaching in order to land? Either that or hijacking. Maybe I don't know much but it seems like the Boeing 737 planes are crappy and don't work well. Bucky winter soldier (talk) 20:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any suggestions to improve the article? Article talk pages are not a place to voice your opinions about aircraft, they are a place to discuss contributions to articles. - ZLEA _T\^C 02:00, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry again. I am new here. Did not mean to be bothersome. Maybe if there is any info on why some of these failed upon coming in to land. Once again, my apologies. 🙏 Bucky winter soldier (talk) 02:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Take off and landing tend to be the most dangerous parts of a flight, as being low to the ground leaves little room for error. Pilot error is also the leading cause of aviation accidents, and it's usually not due to a problem with the aircraft itself. - ZLEA _T\^C 02:47, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

👍thanks Bucky winter soldier (talk) 11:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing

Do lots of Boeing planes have long lists of crashes like this? If so, I hate to say it, but maybe its not a good company. It was their repair that led to the crash of Japan Airlines flight 123 Bucky winter soldier (talk) 20:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bucky winter soldier It's not the number of accidents and incidents an aircraft has does not necessarily make an aircraft unsafe. The leading cause of aviation accidents is pilot error, which can happen to any aircraft. Also, using an accident that happened almost four decades ago as an example of Boeing being "not a good company" does not make sense. You also have to consider that Boeing is one of the largest aircraft manufacturers in the world, and has produced tens of thousands off commercial aircraft, so the number of accidents and incidents involving Boeing aircraft will obviously be higher than most other companies. That said, Boeing has made some arguable questionable decisions in the past few years, especially regarding the Boeing 737 MAX, but it is ultimately not up to Wikipedia to determine whether Boeing is "not a good company". We go by what reliable sources say. - ZLEA _T\^C 01:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. You have made good points. That makes sense. I guess I am a bit opinionated. Sorry🙏 Bucky winter soldier (talk) 02:15, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]