Talk:List of Teen Titans episodes

Comment

I think that the two-three parters should have two different descriptions, the second continueing from where the first left off. --Wack'd About Wiki 01:21, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Layout Change?

This article currently only shows the episode descriptions that are given by CN or whoever. After looking at episode listings for other shows, it seems like the article could benefit from having a better explanation of each episode. The only problem I see is potentially having to split into articles for each season, which could be seen as cluttering the encyclopedia. KramarDanIkabu 30 June 2005 00:35 (UTC)

I think someone just needs to make the articles less "commercial" and also less "extremely embarrassing to read." I tried to, but that's not the type of thing I'm good at, could someone pretty please help? <3love/User:Teentitans! (I promise, I'm just not logged in for technical reasons)

Whoever typed those blurbs up kept using "Titan's", and virtually NONE of them needed apostrophes. Must've tried to paste over all of them or something... I corrected all I found; there might be more. 17:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

How about using Template:Episode list^(Help)? And Titans fans, please help us by rewrriting episode summaries. --JSH-alive^{talk to me}_{see my works}^{mail to me} 06:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I have started to rewrite the summaries to make them more detailed. Have a look-see on the changes I've made and let me know if you see any errors. Michae2109 01:59, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Summaries were copyvios

I removed all the summaries because they were cut and pasted from toonzone.net or some other similar page. For instance, look at these google searches, [1], [2], etc. If someone wants to summarize, not copy, the old summaries, they're here. - Peregrinefisher 21:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

The Apprentice?

On the day I left this, there was an episode called this (^), and it was a two-part thing. Where does it go? - dogman15 19:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

The Judas Contract

Why is this film listed here if it is not part of the series, but a separate venture altogether? --24.19.144.93 20:31, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Future of article

I don't know if you are striving to reach the "featured list" status, as I hope you are, but you'll need to get rid of the DVD images at the bottom. The don't meet non-free image criteria, because there's no critical commentary on them. The same reasoning was behind the removal of all the screenshots from the "List of" articles before. Just giving you a heads up, because I've already seen them removed from FL's that had them before the non-free image armada came in and removed all those images.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 04:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

I am aware of that massive removal of screenshots from a number of LoEs, but what do you mean by "images"? There is only one fair use "image" on this list. It is a rather important DVD cover for a major movie. I hope this isn't considered an excessive usage of non-free content, and I notice List of The Batman episodes contains some non-free images, too. Could you please tell me what should be done to reserve this image? Peacent 12:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Judas Contract is not this

According to this Newsarama article, the Judas Contract film is not associated with the animated series. To quote the article,

NRAMA: Is it connected to the Cartoon Network version of Teen Titans?

MW: No, this has nothing to do with that. This is an adult version. It’s a very strong PG-13 based on the comic, not the cartoon show.

I will be removing it from this article. --24.19.144.93 20:22, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Fine, I don't really mind the Judas Contract. Glad you agreed to leave the Trouble in Tokyo as it is, now move on. Peacent 04:40, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

It was added again. I removed it. Schuym1 (talk) 14:15, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Inclusion tags

Can somebody explain what the <onlyinclude> tags in this article are for? I thought only Wikipedia:Featured content used them, and it's currently not used by that page (see the code of Wikipedia:Featured_content/Lists) Circeus 22:04, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Teen Titans Go

Since the Teen Titans Go comics have a strong continuity with the cartoon, would it be acceptable to put up an issue guide? 71.115.192.199 03:55, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Problem

Season 6? Robot Chicken? This needs a massive edit, or at least a citation.... also, on an unrelated note, both KidsWB and CW4KIDS have stuff from this show on there website, but neither of them have any episodes of it..... whats going on? - AnimationCafe (talk)

Soundtrack

It would be nice to have a collection of soundtracks used in the episodes, because I think there's a lot of stuff not made by Puffy, Amy, Yumi. (Although I'm most intrested in S1Ep6 Nevermore track used in the beginning, during the fight with Dr. Light. Isn't this track used in some FPS game as well? ) --80.98.242.95 (talk) 17:36, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Episode Dates

How come the episode dates in this article is different from the one at TVRage and TV.com? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.201.168.178 (talk) 04:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The Lost Episode

Shouldn't there be a mention of The Lost Episode somewhere on this page? I mean, I know it never aired on TV and was only available via special promotion, but it's still a fully-produced episode. -- 69.14.66.237 (talk) 17:46, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Fear In Florida

The films section lists a film titled "Fear In Florida", scheduled for August 2020, however I cannot find anything on this film whatsoever anywhere online except here. Could someone please provide a source for it? VesperLord (talk) 07:44, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Teen Titans: Fear in Florida

Is the movie fake? Joet51078 (talk) 14:13, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Removal of specials and addition of TTG content

Two changes were recently made to this page by User:Alex 21 that I strongly oppose. Following is a list of these and my reasoning, along with User:Alex 21's arguments in each case (highlighted in green) and my responses to them.

1. The special episode and television film were removed from the series overview.
   1. Wikipedia readers unfamiliar with the show may think that it only consists of 65 episodes and nothing more. Both the movie and the lost episode are integral parts of the series – they were released by the same team, as part of the same universe, in the same style, and on the same home media (the lost episode was included as a bonus feature with the movie, in fact). Furthermore, the movie serves as the series finale, so casual viewers following Wikipedia may end up leaving the show unfinished!
   2. Specials are not included in series overviews per standard practice of WP:TV. I have been editing TV articles here for years, and I have never seen such a practice. MOS:TV, usually so thorough, makes absolutely no mention whatsoever of such a point as far as I could find. For specials that are treated as parts of series by reliable sources, it would violate WP:OR to not include them. On top of that, Template:Series overview specifically includes parameters for specials, and provides multiple examples of how to use them in the documentation (i.e. these parameters are hardly obscure)!
   3. Specials that are not aired in the same manner as the rest of the series are typically not listed. Once again, I have never seen such a practice, nor is it in the MOS. Furthermore, how a particular episode airs has zero bearing on how it is treated as part of the series on Wikipedia. There are shows that used to be broadcast on TV but were then pulled off and aired online-only (e.g. The Legend of Korra) – should we remove the later episodes of that from its series overview too? If anything, Wikipedia has been moving in the opposite direction, with changes such as adding the released parameter as an alias for first_aired in Template:Infobox television out of recognition that different mediums should be treated more similarly, particularly in the current era of blurring distinctions between them.
2. The Teen Titans Go! crossover movie was added.
   1. This is original research! No reliable source claims that it is part of this series, as opposed to TTG. Furthermore, even for the sake of informal discussion here: the "second movie" much like TTG is produced by a very different team, as part of a different universe, and in a different style; and has entirely separate home media.
   2. [S]tandard practice [is] to include a film that includes the same characters. This is an example of the begging the question fallacy; where is the evidence that they are the "same" characters? Is there a WP:RS confirming that? Wikipedia editors simply assuming that is fundamentally the same WP:OR problem in the first place!
   3. For example, at List of Steven Universe episodes; "Say Uncle" and "Crossover Nexus" are not canon to the series, and yet they are listed. This is a WP:OSE argument. If other pages include crossovers with no WP:RS confirming them as such, they must be removed as well. In fact, WP:OR and WP:V are not even "ordinary" policy but Wikipedia:Core content policies, and as such automatically override any and all "consensus" on individual pages. (This is not to say that a crossover or other relevant material not confirmed as part of a series cannot be mentioned somewhere, like on the main Teen Titans show page in this case, but certainly not in a way that may cause an uninformed reader to think it is.)

Modernponderer (talk) 15:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Please note that this discussion is now moot, as User:Alex 21 self-reverted these changes here. This talk page section is left up as-is in case this issue ever comes up again. Modernponderer (talk) 10:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

TTG content redux

User:MacCready, nobody is questioning that the crossover movie uses the same characters. The question here is whether it is part of the same series, and that is original research.

By adding the crossover, you are necessarily making the implication that this show has been "revived" by this movie, which is blatantly false according to all known reliable sources on the matter. (In fact, some of them seem to refer to the crossover movie as a "testing ground" for an actual potential revival, which obviously contradicts one having already happened.) Modernponderer (talk) 19:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

I see. Would you say it would warrant inclusion in the scenario of the proposed sixth season actually eventually being made? MacCready (talk) 20:55, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

@User:MacCready: Perhaps, but again it depends on how it's done.

If it's established as a "reboot", it should probably get its own show page with its own episode list (whether separate or integrated). Especially considering how much coverage such a new series would get, there would almost certainly be more than enough material for a standalone article to pass notability with flying colours.

But if it's something like Samurai Jack season 5, where nobody questions that it's a direct continuation even after so many years and despite numerous changes, then of course it should be included here. Modernponderer (talk) 23:28, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Glitch about two-parters

I don't know what this is all about but there's some sort of glitch going on on wikipedia where it won't list the two-part or three-part episodes on the episode lists. Can someone please fix this? 68.150.112.218 (talk) 00:56, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Disruptive Editor

We currently have an editor who continues to go into each season's page and add fake ratings. Not only are these ratings unsourced, but they are proven to be false due to legitimate ratings existing for several episodes. I believe the editor has been blocked before, but has somehow gotten around it. Is there a way we can protect/lock these pages?--Jonathan (talk) 21:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)