This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article lies in the latitude of WikiProject Piracy, a crew of scurvy editors bound to sharpen up all Wikipedia's piracy-related articles. If you want to ship with us and help improve this and other Piracy-related articles, lay aboard the project page and sign on for a berth.PiracyWikipedia:WikiProject PiracyTemplate:WikiProject PiracyPiracy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
Of all these characters, only the GA gets a separate article? Perhaps that's left over from some past arrangement, but that strikes me as highly unnecessary - not even the main characters need their own pages. - DavidWBrooks22:36, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's a very good point. (By the way, I'm the guy who re-introduced the apostrophe, so I'm pro-apostrophe.) The only argument in favor of the weird apostrophe is increased readability when you are using a single letter as a word - for example, the sentence "the report card had all A's" because otherwise it reads like "... had all As" like the word "as" which makes no sense.
I'm an American, and this may be a case where American and British style differ.
Could well be another case of US/GB variation, it is a source of constant amazement that I come across a new difference in our common language almost every day. I've done some more digging and I can't find confirmation of the transatlantic variation but according to a certain unreliable source it is "acceptable to use apostrophes to show plurals of single lower-case letters" but "upper case letters need no apostrophe" which may well be where the confusion has arisen. I've also looked through some of the other Swallows and Amazons articles and there is a fair smattering of both Ds and D's so perhaps if a consensus can be reached here we should have consistency everywhere else as well.Nancy talk08:12, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I came across this inconsistency in the articles and I'm not sure which way to go. My Jonathan Cape editions of the books have "D.'s" in the text (and lettered in the endpaper map for Winter Holiday, along with "S.'s" and "A.'s").Modal Jig (talk) 17:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the information on "whether to use apostrophe with the initialism of Dot and Dick" can be found in Ransome's papers alongside information on "name of youngest Walker child"!
Anyway, somebody needs to BE BOLD and decide, and make changes needed for consistency; it really doesn't matter one way or the other. I just did a search of the Times online and it uses an apostrophe (e.g., "Prisoner A writes down the colour of Prisoner B's hat. Prisoner B writes down the colour that Prisoner A's hat is not."), so I'd say let's use it. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 20:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That is a different use of the apostrophe, in the Times quote it is being used to indicate possessive case, rather than in "The D's went for a walk" where it indicates the plural and could be replaced by "The Ds". Dabbler (talk) 22:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Seven years ago I asked why only the GA had a separate article, of all the characters. Now I'm asking why only Nancy Blackett has a separate article. That seems, IMHO, unnecessary. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Nancy article contains a great deal more information about that character than is provided for the other characters in this article. Either this article would benefit from expanding the character information or there might be a case for separate expanded articles on some of the others - perhaps an article covering the Walkers and their origins, perhaps adding a Peggy section to Nancy's article. RGCorris (talk) 17:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I love S&A as much as anybody, but it seems to me that crafting separate articles discussing the half-dozen characters (or more) as important as Captain Nancy, including links to academic wild guesswork about sex, would take us too far down the path to fancruft and/or thesis-seeking literary analysis. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 17:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]