Talk:List of Polish royal consorts

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Poland Mid‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Nice job. I'd have one suggestion: separate portraits from coats of arms. I am sure we could try to fit both in our list? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 14:53, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, image of the coat of arms is used only when there is no portrait available. Adding a seperate column for the coat of arms would make the list squeezed and it wouldn't add much. Surtsicna (talk) 18:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Missing?

Perhaps Elżbieta Szydłowska should be here? --85.226.44.201 (talk) 10:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

She have been included now. As this is a list of consorts, not queens, she should be her as the consort of a king. --85.226.40.6 (talk) 15:48, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]