Talk:List of Melbourne Football Club players
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Size split?
[edit]Split - Article is over 200 kB, and should be split by half-century (i.e. 1850-1899, 1900-1949, 1950-1999, 2000-present). Thoughts? Suggestions?--Jax 0677 (talk) 00:31, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- I removed the colour from most cells, dropping the size down to just over 200 kB. If we are to split, we could remove the "haven't played yet" and "listed but delisted without playing a game" sections, but you'd have to wonder if they would survive as standalone lists. Your suggestion of by half-century definitely isn't acceptable, but possibly before and after 1940/WWII/1945/1950 could work, but it would just be an arbitrary separation with no meaning or reason, other than to fit in some other arbitrary suggested size limit. So, as it has been 2 months without any action, I'm removing the tags and leading it as is. The-Pope (talk) 16:02, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Career Length
[edit]The Melbourne career column should be from when the player was first listed to when they were delisted as that is a truer reflection of when they were at the club, and even though some didn't play in their first/last year, they still took up a spot on Melbourne's list. It is also consistent with the later sections in the page for players who are listed and still yet to debut, and players who were listed and didn't play a game. I've already gone through the 2010's players and fixed them up and am happy to do the rest too. Flickerd (talk) 05:26, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- That might be a truer reflection of a career span but I think the problem is that while it would be consistent with the later sections of the page, it will be inconsistent with the vast number of players on this page as it's mainly recent or current players that we are going to/able to list this way. Jevansen (talk) 08:09, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah I agree in terms of earlier players, and I saw that as a potential problem, but I've gone through earlier players and when they were listed and have found some discrepancies. I'll work through it, but I think it's definitely doable to do it for the players before the draft was established, it just might take a bit of time, but it's something I think is important, and as previously said, I'm happy to do it. Flickerd (talk) 11:58, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Melbourne Football Club players. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161021131942/http://www.triplem.com.au/melbourne/sport/afl/news/2016/10/melbourne-delists-four-more/ to http://www.triplem.com.au/melbourne/sport/afl/news/2016/10/melbourne-delists-four-more/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:46, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)