Talk:List of Iraqi Airways destinations

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Iraqi Airways destinations article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

No consensus, 26 March 2024, see discussion.
keep, October 24, 2015, see discussion.

Aviation: Airlines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airline project.

Iraq

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Created destinations page

Created Page as it makes destinations look much nicer and neater. Please discuss wether you like the page. Thank you.

Joey Boeing 777 (talk) 18:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flags

I propose that flags be added to countries as it can be helped to scan for that country. I have read they can be used for that if wanted.

Joey Boeing 777 (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They don't really help much. I find most hard to ID most of them. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 23:20, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I find them helpful, I appreciate you're point of view. I read tho that they are allowed to be used as I said before. I would enjoy it if they could stay. Thanks.

Joey Boeing 777 (talk) 23:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Destinations in question

Several destinations in the terminated section are referenced to blog submissions from aviation related sites. For instance, the inclusion of New York is referenced to an entry in which the writer admits not knowing for sure if this information is accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.202.34.28 (talk) 04:18, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Terminated destinations

The terminated destination format has been on ongoing debate to how it should be layed out. I have accepted how it should be layed out, for example

Asia

United Arab Emirates - Abu Dhabi

but I feel this is not living up to full standards and therefor I have changed the style to keep it on the guide lines but to link the continents, countries and the cities as it is much more effective and useful. Comments welcome. Zaps93 (talk) 11:09, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a change for the better, IMO. In any event, why make a selective edit only here? Why not discuss at the project page first? amd what is "full standards"? Whose "full standards" are these? Jasepl (talk) 12:42, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry bad choice of words 'full standards' that is, but I feel it is an improvement to the page, maybe you don't feel so, but like you said its you opinion and I am not gotta argue with your opinion. I feel it is better as it links the cities which aren't listed on the page, like you would have to go to the top of the page to search for Abu Dhabi when you could easily click on the link. I shall put my point across at the page. Thanks, Zaps93 (talk) 13:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No need edit reverted.115.42.64.179 (talk) 16:41, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As discussed before, do not change till a decision has been decided. Zaps93 (talk) 16:49, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Zaps/Joey, how can a decision be made, when it hasn't been brought up for discussion? You made the change several days ago to suit your preferences without discussing it appropriately. And it's still not been discussed. My view is to retain the original agreed-upon format until (if) your version gets consensus. Thanks. Jasepl (talk) 19:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now that you put it that way, yes, revert. Although the Joey bit? That has confused me. Zaps93 (talk) 19:38, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Destinations and map

Germany is served according to arabic website, FRA shows up in updated schedules every week and so does malmo, update map.116.71.44.238 (talk) 20:40, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's incorrect information I'm afraid. I thought it was correct myself, but looking in to it, they revamped their old website www.iraqiairways.co.uk and relaunched it in December 2009. It lists every destination except Malmo and Frankfurt. If what you say 'Malmo is a charter' we do not list it, if it was seasonal we would. Hope that clears up any info. Zaps93 (talk) 23:40, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Terminated destinations map needs updating, include spain in there, as for arabic website I doubt the information is false.116.71.62.7 (talk) 19:40, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a proper one, all that information seems false compared to the new one, the new one also includes Arabic and as for the map I'll sort it now. Zaps93 (talk) 19:52, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Map is still wrong it shows Myanmar as Vietnam, and dosent show Yougoslavia, USSR, E & W Germany N & S Yemen nor united Czechoslovakia a sthey were back then.

New webiste only caters UK market, its not accurate. 118.103.238.233 (talk) 17:22, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The map doesn't matter of back then and the new website also covers Arabian information. It's accurate. Zaps93 (talk) 19:06, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Map still showing Myanmar as Vietnam.116.71.53.181 (talk) 18:35, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll sort it out when I get home. Regards, Zaps93 (talk) 18:36, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

are you home now?116.71.63.214 (talk) 17:42, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan served added reference.116.71.93.148 (talk) 01:50, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for letting me know. I'll get on to it right now! Regards, Zaps93 (talk) 10:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

arabic website

Kindly let the site link remain, its accurate and uptodate, thankyou.116.71.61.88 (talk) 19:57, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Iraqi Airways destinations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]