Talk:List of Indian timber trees

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This list would be more useful if the botanical name is added just below the common name in the same box Paul venter 06:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've done almost all of them. "Ironwood" and "Red cedar" are still unclear however... Also, some the common names correspond to more than one species, so I chose the most common reference. --Schzmo 12:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - the table makes a lot more sense now! It's like running into old friends who've taken off their disguises. Are you thinking of doing articles on each of these timber species? Paul venter 14:05, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd probably only be able to make stubs. Some of these tree species are pretty obscure and while I was searching up the scientific names, I didn't see much information on the species (i.e., the redlinked ones). --Schzmo 22:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Elm

I'm also confused about "Indian Elm"; I'm not sure which elm species it corresponds to. The Slippery Elm is also called Indian Elm, but this obviously can't be the right one since it's a New World species. --Schzmo 02:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Himalayan Elm perhaps ? What is the source of the list on the article ? Perhaps that will help in identification. Shyamal 04:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio?

I'm not sure which was copied to where, but Basic Civil Engineering by Shibu Nalpat contains a lot of exact word to word sentences given in this article.--thunderboltz ^(Deepu) 14:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC) Answer'[reply]

Basic Civil Engineering book was wriiten in 2002 June. - Shibu Nalpat.

Sheesham

I'm not sure how to edit a table like this but would Sheesham (Indian rosewood, Thakkat, Jali) be a suitable addition (used for furniture making)? 89.240.7.182 20:20, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added a row into the table. Feel free to add the details such as density, distribution and use. Shyamal 09:51, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. On reading more about this timber I see it is already listed in the table as Sissoo so I have rv'ed the extra line. I notice that the article doesn't quote any sources. Here are a couple for Sissoo [1][2]. Sissoo probably warrants an article of its own. It would be nice to have a picture of the tree itself and an item of furniture. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.240.2.188 (talk) 10:58, 20 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Red cedar

It seems to be twice on the page. However the describtion is different.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on List of Indian timber trees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]