Talk:List of Even Stevens episodes

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Templates

I've tried to create a template for how each season should look on the main page and how each individual episode's page should look. Adjust as needed. Gotta love Even Stevens! - <span class="user-sig user-USERNAME">Pergrinefisher</span> 06:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you could also put pictures for the episodes like you did for that episode Swap.comLAUGH90 23:45, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because of wikipedia's fair use requirements there needs to be an episode summary before the picture can be added. I can add screenshots to any episode that has a summary in the first season. - Peregrinefisher 02:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some images. The summaries are pretty small though, and I'm going to wait until they are bigger to add the rest. They should be about the size of the one for Stevens Genes. - Peregrinefisher 19:15, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Now that we have summaries for all the episodes, it's time for screenshots. You can get images here. Make sure they illustrate a key moment in the episode. - Peregrinefisher 03:36, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I found another source for images, but I always give the webmaster credit. Which image should I use for the episode The Big Splash?

A)Tugnut Gets Splashed? Image:Tugnut Gets Splashed.jpg

or B)Soak Us Louis!? Image:Soak Us Louis.jpg

DanTD 21:00, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like the second one, Image:Soak Us Louis.jpg. - Peregrinefisher 21:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then. I guess I'll add Tugnut getting splashed to the episode description. DanTD 18:06, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now they're all being deleted, because the episodes they were connected to are being deleted! Thanks again, TTN! ----DanTD 18:32, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Infobox on Ren-Gate

~~Will somebody fix the God-Damn infobox on "Ren-Gate" for me?! No matter what I try to do, I can't get it to show up right on this one episode.~~---- DanTD 04:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I found the problem. I forgot two brackets at one end. ---- DanTD 12:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Episode notability

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The decision was to redirect all episodes to the list. This is not a vote, so opinions only catering to fan interest play no part in it. TTN 19:28, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All of the episodes of this series fail the notability guidelines for television episodes. The way for these articles to be improved is through the inclusion of real-world information from reliable sources to assert notability. That is unlikely to happen, and these only contain overly long plot summaries, trivia, and quotes. Per that, they need to be a small part of this list. If there are no objections, these will be redirected soon. TTN 19:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not this crap again! ---- DanTD 20:22, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I object! I do believe you may remember the Spongebob Episode incident? Where all of the episode information was deleted? Afterward, Everyone (including me) was complaining about the lack of information. So speaking for the Society for the Prevention of Information Deletion (SPID), we suggest that you leave the episodes the way they are. If you do this, we shall greatly appreaciate this. Thank you. Liberator14 15:24, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I object. Please use the Wikipedia:Television episodes/Review process. - Peregrine Fisher 05:46, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Just a formality, if there are others willing to join the Society for the Prevention of Information Deletion, please write a follow up to this message. I understand this has no relevance to the article, but I have no where else to include it. In short, I do not want any angry e-mails from the staff, I'm just trying to help the cause. Thank you for your time. Liberator14 15:28, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Redirect per TTN. No shadow of out-of-universe notability established in any of these articles, which is the consensus standard laid out at WP:EPISODE. Eusebeus 16:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- What in God's name fits the criteria for "out-of-universe notability?" Do these episodes have to spark global upheaveal rivaling the phony Danish cartoon controversy or something? This whole thing is becoming asinine!! ---- DanTD 15:58, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uncertain for most of the episodes, but definitely Strong Keep for Influenza: The Musical! WAVY 10 17:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advice to interested editors

This is a boilerplate bit of advice to editors of television episode articles which have come under Wikipedia:Television episodes/Review.

There is fairly widespread consensus that not all television episodes are sufficiently notable to merit articles of their own in Wikipedia. In the interest of fairness, the Wikipedia:Television episodes/Review process has been established, to determine whether it's possible to establish out-of-universe importance and real-world context for television episode articles. For example, after uncontroversial discussion here, articles on individual episodes of The Simple Life were turned into redirects to List of The Simple Life episodes.

If you're interested in keeping episode articles, the key thing is to find reliable sources discussing individual episodes. Sources which may help establish notability for these episodes include reviews in newspapers, discussion in specialist magazines, and detailed episode guides. (Some of my fellow editors feel that episode guides aren't sufficiently independent of the subject to establish notability, but I disagree, especially for professionally published episode guides.) The key thing for improvement of these articles is to include some real-world content (ratings are a good start) and information beyond plot summaries and cast lists. If there are any books published about this series, see if the production or impact of individual episodes are discussed, and add that information to the episode articles. If someone used sources like these books on a handful of these episode articles, to indicate that the episodes of this series have received sufficient coverage in reliable sources that any episode of the series could have encyclopedic coverage, I'd support leaving the other articles as they are, because the potential would have been demonstrated. I hope that interested editors will take up this challenge, and improve the articles so that they won't be redirected.—Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 21:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I'd like to thank(actually blame) TTN for screwing this up for all of us, by making wikipedia episode articles impossible to write!! ---- DanTD 05:27, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ностальгия

Решил вспомнить детство, а тут перевод, оказывается, днищенский. Тогда я этого, естесственно, не замечал, но сейчас смотреть просто невыносимо. Ни одна, я повторяю, НИ ОДНА шутка не была переведена правильно. Хотя б-г с ним, с правильностью, тут даже банально в тайминг не попадают. И интонации идиотские. Такое чувство, что актёры читали текст без видеоряда. На англ. язе панчлайн давно произнесли, а наши слоупоки только сетап начинают зачитывать. Причём слышно в голосе, что шутки они абсолютно не отдупляют.

Можно посмотреть на корявую игру мелкого дотрансформенного и ещё не безумного Шайи ЛаБафа, которого тут в титрах называют "Шиа ЛаБеуф". Почти Беовульф XD

Ну и ещё тут есть просто пышущая сексом, несмотря на возраст, Марго Харшман. В детстве был в неё влюблён. Из-за неё, собственно, и смотрел по большей части. Да и сейчас при взгляде на неё в этом сериале движение в штанах не пропало. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.194.122.135 (talk) 18:06, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]