Talk:List of Bleach volumes

List of Bleach volumes is a former featured list. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to featured list standard, you may renominate the article to become a featured list.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 6, 2006	Articles for deletion	No consensus
December 4, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
January 14, 2009	Featured list candidate	Not promoted
February 28, 2009	Featured list candidate	Promoted
July 31, 2011	Featured list removal candidate	Demoted
September 14, 2014	Peer review	Reviewed
Current status: Former featured list

Anime and manga: Bleach Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Bleach work group.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

Splitting

The article has become 79 kylobites long. With more archiving refs or new volumes it will very heavy. As such, I purpose we split the first 21 volumes from this list into List of Bleach chapters (1–187). Thus, this list should be moved to List of Bleach manga volumes. Please comment.Tintor2 (talk) 20:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why 21 volumes and not 20 or 25? Good raise 21:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The English box set contains volumes 1-21, so it seems like a good place. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 21:42, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The page is currently 80K. We're not hitting WP:SIZE problems at the moment, so I don't think splitting is needed right now. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 23:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

but, i do agree it would be a nice thing to do —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.89.110.40 (talk) 01:37, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why would it be a nice thing to do? What's the deal with splitting up the chapters, it's a terrible idea, they work much better as only one article. Naruto is the only forgivable one because the series is split up into 2 parts, but Bleach is not. 173.79.31.198 (talk) 15:07, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the comments above? The article is 80 kylobites long causing it to be very long and slow to work with. Naruto is not the only list to have been splitted, see List of One Piece manga volumes. Now, the article does not have this issue, but with a new volume released it will have it.Tintor2 (talk) 17:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but I disagree with One Piece being split, but I was too late to get involved with that 173.79.31.198 (talk) 00:16, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your argument seems WP:I just don't like it. The One Piece list was splitted for good due to the length from the series. We ll need to split this article too when it becomes a bit longer.Tintor2 (talk) 00:23, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I might interject here, is there any reason the list couldn't be sectioned off, similar to what I did (albeit out of necessity) on List of Oh My Goddess! chapters? 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{(Dinoguy1000)} 17:21, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No idea. I guess this could help readers.Tintor2 (talk) 20:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update: The article is already 92 kylobites long. Should we wait more for a split?Tintor2 (talk) 15:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That this list is featured makes it somewhat of a special case. (We wouldn't want to go through the hassle of doing several FLRCs if it wasn't necessary, would we?) Just wait till the series hits 50 volumes. That'll make for three decently sized sub-lists and, at that point, I doubt you'll get much of an argument about the issue. Good raise 08:51, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It may be time to reconsider splitting the article, being over 100 Kb and 50 volumes can make 3 decent size lists. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 00:26, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeez, it's been so long that I don't remember how many volumes should the sublist be composed. Tje English box set contains volumes 1-21, while in most cases, chapters split lead to 20 volumes.Tintor2 (talk) 01:38, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If there isn't an MoS for this, I would personally keep 1-21 together since they mark one whole arc and are gathered into a box set by Viz. Try checking with the project. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 02:50, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why bother the project for everything? Be bold! Flip a coin, or something. Seriously... Good raise 20:52, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I threw the first coin, but I have doubts about the second one. Does it sound right that List of Bleach chapters (188–367) occupies vols. 22-42? I have even more doubts whether a List of Bleach chapters (368–current) could be created. Wouldn't it require constant moves like the One Piece lists?Tintor2 (talk) 01:30, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, chapters 188 through 367 in volumes 22 through 42 sounds right.

The One Piece lists require constant moving? I wasn't aware of that. Is one move in several years too often in your book? Good raise 02:54, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not really now that I think so. I'll give it a try in the evening. I'm sleepy right now.Tintor2 (talk) 03:01, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now having an actual end of a story arc, it may be better to split it as such, and divide the second list as volumes 22-48. The two guidebooks MASKED&UNMASKED show there to be an official divide after chapter 423, Bells Are Blue/Bleach My Soul/The Vanishing Soul, and chapters 424+ are called Death Substitute Vanishment Arc by Shonen Jump's official website... what does everyone else think? Akata (talk) 22:01, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should add again the poem/tagline section.

Add them under the appropriate volume. Y'know, like...

"Poem

   * "We fear that which we cannot see"

"

or

"Poem

   * "If I were the rain
     That joins sky and earth that otherwise never touch
     Could I join two hearts as well?"

"

I'm not good at descriptions, just look here: http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=List_of_Bleach_chapters&oldid=220400643 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Notshortbutchibi (talk • contribs) 22:56, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No. They violate copyright, do not add to the understanding of the topic, and are trivial at best. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 23:21, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't Spanish titles have translations?

We can't assume every reader from wikipedia knows Spanish. Titles like "Falta de Armonia", "Mala Suerte" need an English translation in the same way that Japanese titles are translated in chapter lists. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 19:12, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Title reason

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Archive 51#Volumes or manga volumes for reason of the article's title.Tintor2 (talk) 01:03, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Bleach volumes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]