This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland
Useful list but I think is suffers heavily from distracting citation overkill. Why not just simply state that the whole list is based on Weston 1995 pp. 236-238, and only add refs in the table where different source is used. Alternatively the refs could be moved to the notes section. Also might be worth having a column with images, like List of Frank Lloyd Wright works. --ELEKHHT06:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate the thoughts; however they are not all based on anyone source. Citation overkill doesn't seem to point at pages like this, where there are a lot of citation but no more than 2 or 3 for each point. I understand what you are saying, but IMHO, the need for citation is there as there is a lot of discrepancies as to what and when his work was. Thanks againspeednat (talk) 13:43, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I propose that the section Writing and documented speeches be split into a separate pageList of Alvar Aalto's writings (just 'writings', not 'writings and documented speeches', for simplicity, and as speeches are usually written anyway). Currently the article is too long (100kB+) and unwieldy to navigate comfortably; there is conceptually quite a big difference between an architect's designs and writings so combining them in the same article makes little sense; and the current article structure and layout are messy, which would be helped by splitting it. Both the new articles would be easily long enough as standalone ones. I believe this would be in line with WP:SPLITTING. Views? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:24, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]