Talk:Lisbon District

Portugal High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Untitled

pls move to Lisboa District TrueColour (talk) 23:40, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lisbon District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110125232229/http://eleicoes.cne.pt/sel_eleicoes.cfm?m=vector to http://eleicoes.cne.pt/sel_eleicoes.cfm?m=vector

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:33, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Flag of District of Lisbon.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:08, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The population of the Lisbon District is wrong

If you analysize the data in the 2021 census of portugal the Municipalities that make up the Lisbon District amount to 2,275,385 people:

Regions Population Alenquer 44442 Amadora 171454 Arruda dos Vinhos 13992 Azambuja 21421 Cadaval 13372 Cascais 214124 Lisboa 545796 Loures 201590 Lourinhã 26240 Mafra 86515 Odivelas 148034 Oeiras 171658 Sintra 385606 Sobral de Monte Agraço 10540 Torres Vedras 83072 Vila Franca de Xira 137529 'Total '2275385

Panos1b (talk) 14:22, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]