Jump to content

Talk:Lisa Ann/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Parody

If this to be a parody, then I think it is inaccurate to say that she will be playing the part of Sarah Palin, the 2008 vp etc. She will be playing the part of the character Serra Pailin, an entirely different matter.--Die4Dixie (talk) 08:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

What the hell are u saying dude, are u crazy or what. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.243.4.66 (talk) 02:11, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

cougar?

i must be out of it. since when does a 36 year old qualify as a cougar? milf, sure. but cougar? maybe in about 10 years. and hasn't the term "milf" been WAY overdone? if was funny in "american pie", but now people use "milf" to describe anyone over the age of 25. why can't lisa ann be just plain ole' HOT? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.241.143.189 (talk) 12:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

She has a kid, so that makes her a milf. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.243.4.66 (talk) 02:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

son equals milf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.125.181.42 (talk) 22:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Lisa Ann 2010.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Lisa Ann 2010.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:32, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

What is her real surname?

This page does not give her real surname. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.102.153.66 (talk) 16:30, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Because we don't have a reliable source for it... Tabercil (talk) 19:24, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
And even if we did, we'd still need to reach consensus about the application of WP:BLPNAME, especially the part I've bolded here for emphasis:

Caution should be applied when identifying individuals who are discussed primarily in terms of a single event. When the name of a private individual has not been widely disseminated or has been intentionally concealed, such as in certain court cases or occupations, it is often preferable to omit it, especially when doing so does not result in a significant loss of context. When deciding whether to include a name, its publication in secondary sources other than news media, such as scholarly journals or the work of recognized experts, should be afforded greater weight than the brief appearance of names in news stories. Consider whether the inclusion of names of private living individuals who are not directly involved in an article's topic adds significant value. The presumption in favor of privacy is strong in the case of family members of articles' subjects and other loosely involved, otherwise low-profile persons.

"especially the part I've bolded"
The correct word is emboldened. Doh!
Err... but she 's not being described in terms of a single event.79.69.199.182 (talk) 22:10, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
In a vast number of cases, a porn star's name is intentionally concealed because of his/her occupation. Omitting it results in NO significant loss of context. It adds NO significant value. Please note, also, that WP:BLPNAME appears in a subhed of the general policy, a subhed devoted to "Presumption in favor of privacy". Presumptions can be rebutted, by consensus. But someone arguing to defeat the deliberate concealment of a porn actress' name bears a heavy burden of persuasion indeed. David in DC (talk) 20:15, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Surely a pornographic actor intentionally conceals their name because of his/her _public_ occupation? If omitting it didn't result in significant loss of information, the actor wouldn't omit it and use a pseudonym instead! We include non-pornographic actors names, why should pornographers be treated differently? It adds contextual value, as some pornographic actors undergo significant cosmetic surgery which transforms them and makes them unidentifiable.79.69.199.182 (talk) 22:10, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
We disagree. Please do not insert this information, per WP:BLPNAME unless/until others weigh in and a consensus (one way or the other) can be determined. Perhaps you might seek further input from the WP Pornography project, on the BLP Noticeboard, or by way of an RfC.
I'm darned near unpersuadable on the topic of porn actors' names. But that doesn't mean I'm right. I have no corner on the wisdom market. Hell, sometimes I'm moved to wonder if I even have a stall there. Would folks who monitor this page please weigh in? David in DC (talk) 11:54, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

I have deleted the revision to this talk page and the two revisions to the article in which a name was put forward with an inadequate source. Such private information should only be published with excellent sourcing. The article is about her career under the name Lisa Ann. Yngvadottir (talk) 21:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 August 2014

60.6.212.61 (talk) 08:06, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

In order to make a change, you have to tell us what you think needs changing. Dismas|(talk) 08:18, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

2014 appearance

http://www.thesdrshow.com/751/ I wanted to post a link to her recent appearance on this show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuliaWDHarrison (talk • contribs) 00:46, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 April 2015

post url of a site where all the videos of the history of porn star Elpro0710 (talk) 23:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Kharkiv07Talk 23:39, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Actually we can't, a link like that is not allowed per WP:EL, but if you Google the actresses name, the list you are looking for will likely be presented. --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 03:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 May 2015

211.162.33.45 (talk) 09:39, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as you have not requested a change. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 13:29, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 June 2015

i would like to edit this 82.30.92.142 (talk) 09:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

 Not done This is not the right page to request additional user rights.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request. - Arjayay (talk) 09:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lisa Ann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:13, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

No

Sex (talk) 03:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Not done: Empty request - Mlpearc (open channel) 03:29, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Lisa Ann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lisa_Ann/Archive_1&oldid=1014750123"