Talk:Lipschütz ulcer

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Lipschütz ulcer.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

A fact from Lipschütz ulcer appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 December 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that, despite being a genital ulcer, Lipschütz ulcer is not an STD, and is in fact most common in virgins?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/December.

Wikipedia

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Sources for expansion

[1] (German), [2] (German), [3] Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:48, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK, question

The article can make DYK with a good hook. One might be the answer to a question raised by the article but not yet answered: what is this condition usually misdiagnosed as? --Una Smith (talk) 04:20, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Behçet's disease. Will add a source. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:14, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]