Talk:Lipošćak affair/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 18:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tomobe03! I'll be reviewing this and the other two articles due to the ongoing GAN backlog. I will start the review a bit later. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 18:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

"(Afera Lipošćak)" → ({{lang-sh|Afera Lipošćak}})
Link Slovene People's Party with Slovene People's Party (historical), the current link redirects to the modern reincarnation.
Typo: abd → and.
"The National Council resorted to conscription..." – missing space at the start of the sentence.
Rest of the text is alright. It meets the criteria.
Copyvios unlikely.
- I believe I have addressed the above now.--Tomobe03 (talk) 17:08, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All are alright. I would prefer the addition of alt texts though.
- I plan to move this to ACR later on (time permitting) and add alt text before that nomination.--Tomobe03 (talk) 17:07, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]