Talk:Lionel Gilbert

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Lionel Gilbert is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Lionel Gilbert has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 5, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Quality review from WP Biography

A request was made at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography to review this article against the quality criteria. I currently believe the article to be at C-class and have provided a list of issues below that you may want to look at to take this to the next level. If you can resolve these issues it should easily make B-class and it would be worth listing it for a GA review.

Opening paragraph says, "[he] worked as a teacher and headmaster in state schools in various locations around New South Wales until 1961." That implies to a reader that he was a headmaster for much of that time but the article body says he was a headmaster only for his final year. Maybe write "worked as a teacher and later a headmaster in state schools..."
Academia and curator career section says, "In 1961, was appointed by the university as a Research and Information Officer in the Department of External Studies." Should that be "he was appointed"?
Academia and curator career section says, "Holding the position for 21 years, he oversaw expansion of the facility to better present the history of education in Australia, including the establishment of the college's Historical Resources Centre in 1974, and the relocation to the museum of three historic school buildings from Armidale High School and Dumaresq Public School between 1976 and 1980." That is a very long sentence and I lost the thread of it halfway through. Consider splitting into separate sentences.
Academia and curator career section says, "Also in 1972, he was awarded a Churchill Fellowship to the U.K. for four weeks to study how museums in the UK contributed to general education." It is normal practice to write "UK" in Wikipedia articles though if there is a compelling argument for Australian usage of "U.K." then the latter version may be valid. In any case the article should be consistent in the form that is chosen.
Other work section says, "he joined the Armidale Town Clerk in a successful petition". Is Town Clerk a formal title in this context or just a job role? Armidale town clerk may be more appropriate.
The footnotes are confusing and it is hard to work out what most of them refer to. It is normal practice on Wikipedia to refer to one publication per footnote - are the footnotes here each referring to multiple publications? Also, if you are going to refer to a publication in a bibliography or works section, it is usually wise to include the publication year such as <ref>Australian College of Educators (2012).</ref>. If another publication by Australian College of Educators is added later by another editor it will be impossible to tell whether the "ACE" footnotes refer to the first or second publication without a date or other distinguishing reference.

The footnotes issue is the most important point here and the key factor holding this back from B-class. Road Wizard (talk) 09:10, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you. Cla68 (talk) 11:28, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lionel Gilbert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]