Talk:Linux kernel oops

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Copyright issues

It looks to me like the entire emails are being quoted; no assertion is made that the emails were released under a Free license or are available under fair use (I'll give you a hint: quoting the entire email and making that be the bulk of the article most definitely is not fair use). The emails need to either have their license clarified or be removed and summarized/paraphrased instead. --Gwern (contribs) 20:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently this has been addressed but no-one has updated this discussion. So there. --Jerome Potts (talk) 09:16, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

System.map

According to this web page, this article should link to System.map (which is an orphan article). --Jerome Potts (talk) 09:16, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me, done. --85.131.22.173 (talk) 11:06, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Custom kernels

I wonder if it's useful to report kerneloopses of custom kernels or are they already swamped with the official data? --85.131.22.173 (talk) 11:05, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

oops.kernel.org seems to be working

in this article it has been written that the specified site "oops.kernel.org" is now defunct. Reference was a conversation in some Google group which said that the databases were unable to be fetched. But now they connect to 'git' properly Shashank16392 (talk) 16:06, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That statement was about kerneloops.org, but then someone changed kerneloops.org to oops.kernel.org. I will go ahead and remove it. -- intgr [talk] 17:06, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it to a reference. Is that alright?

Shashank16392 (talk) 17:25, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Usually such things shouldn't be formatted as citations (see WP:CITE). I have moved it to external links. -- intgr [talk] 17:37, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Linux kernel oops. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:09, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]