Talk:Linguasphere Observatory
 | Note that this article is still in progress, and that the French article Observatoire Linguistique is currently more advanced and more fully documented. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Recent History
[edit]David Dalby died in 2022. Few a few years, I lived close by and became good friends. I am a data person and could see the value (and fragility) of the Linguasphere Register. While David (Dafydd as he preferred to be known in later years) was alive and with renewed vigour after his death I tried to find somebody or some body to continue the work. The strongest candidates were Peter Mousaferiadis of Cultural Infusion and Diversity Atlas and Stephen Jones of Derivation.co. Peter Crossing of The Center for the Study of Global Christianity was also involved, since their Global Christian Database makes use of a Language Code derived from an early version of the Linguasphere codes. (I do not recommend that any of those names, or indeed mine, be added to the article.) By the time I engaged (around 2020) the Linguasphere Observatoire was not functioning and the promised second edition of the Linguasphere Register was no more than some notes. The mentioned parties seem to remain interested, but by the end of 2023 there was no major initiative such as would be needed to continue the work. I ceased my direct involvement, but am willing to be contacted for historical information at Chris.Maynard with the appropriate special character before transforminginformation.com. (I am not a normal contributor to Wikipedia so I may not see edits to this page.) The domain linguaphere.info was scavenged by someone whom we have not been able to contact. We are unable to determine their motives. ChrisMaynard3 (talk) 08:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete?
[edit]With all due respect I think this article should be scrubbed. It appears to be advertising for a more or less vacant website. (Without spending money, neither link seems to provide any substantive information.)
I won't remove it, because I'm still irked by the way my Zeke Hoskin article was killed (it had a lot more merit than this appears to), but maybe some other guardian of the wikis will do the honors? --Haruo 20:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
I accessed their website today (www.linguasphere.com). Here is the statement on the homepage:
- "Linguasphere ICT is no longer in operation, if you are looking for information on ISO 639-6 please visit its offical site at www.geolang.com by either clicking the link or waiting until your browser redirects you."
Linguasphere's former website was mediocre, but it was not the bare-bones shell that appears today. However, it used to contain links to the complete text of the "Linguasphere register of the World's languages and Speech Communites" by David Dalby (Linguasphere Press, 1999) - an important scholarly work. The company that has replaced it, GeoLang, Ltd., has not put it back on-line. I consider the inability to access this work via the web to be a disappointing loss.
On their new homepage, GeoLang, Ltd. states:
- "This site will provide free access to the system that enables identification of the worlds language variants within their derivative hierarchies, from your local dialect through to known major language families. The project is on course but this Company is in its first few months of operation so this web site is very much in the process of being developed."
and goes on to say:
- "... the standardised data is due to be published in January 2008."
Charvex 07:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Merging articles
[edit]Instead of having two stubs, I'm taking the initiative to merge both to here. CJLippert (talk) 21:26, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Something new here
[edit]Linguasphere is obviously something new in the world of linguistics. It appears to be a massive effort. It has its own terminology. The high-level work is already done. What we don't have is the complete map for all the language groups. And, I may be wrong, but they do not yet address extinct languages. Just because it is in development I do not think we should despise it. Something new always takes time and is full of problems. I suggest we take a forward-looking view and keep them on here. Thanks.Dave (talk) 15:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Comments from the former Talk:Linguasphere_language_code page
[edit]sector phylosector [ps] geosector [gs] zone phylozones [pz] or geozones [gz]
can there be a language having ps-gz or another having gs-pz? Idea of examples? Tobias Conradi (Talk) 21:25, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- I think there are quite a few examples of gs-pz zones (e.g. Khoisan languages), but not any ps-gz. I'll have to check this. I believe that ps-gz is theoretically possible, but not most practicable: if the languages of a ps are shown to be in genetic relationship one with another, then the constituent zones of the ps are also likely to be based on genetic relationships. --Gareth Hughes 11:43, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
August 2016 : Further Editing and Updating needed
[edit]Some points raised on this discussion page between 2006 and 2010 were covered four years ago by the updating of the [1] article in 2012, including corresponding references and sources. However, the [2] must be welcomed. Collaboration between the Linguasphere Observatory's Linguasphere Register and the German data-based website www.hortensj-garden.org has been recently referred to under [3]. This development will hopefully be clarified shortly on the Linguasphere Observatory's website [4] and under an improved version of the [5] (and its French-language equivalent). — Preceding ~ comment added by Dafydd y Bladur (talk • contribs) 16:07, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
References
Chiefpapa LLC
[edit]Google developer Bold 102.91.4.100 (talk) 08:38, 25 August 2024 (UTC)