Talk:Lindsey Halligan

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 21 August 2023 by reviewer Robert McClenon (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

United States: Presidents Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents (assessed as Low-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by BlueMoonset talk 17:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Closed as unsuccessful; issues unaddressed and nomination abandoned

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that before Lindsey Halligan became a lawyer in a criminal matter, she was an insurance lawyer? Source: https://www.salon.com/2022/08/17/everyones-saying-no-hires-florida-insurance-lawyer-as-top-attorneys-refuse-to-work-for-him/
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/William J. Murphy (Jesuit)

Created by 2603:7000:2101:AA00:CCC9:7E7B:26A9:1834 (talk). Nominated by Launchballer (talk) at 19:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Lindsey Halligan; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

The alt0 hook is kind of boring IMO (lawyer practices insurance and criminal law) and hides the key fact that makes her interesting. I'd suggest the following alt:
- alt1 ... that attorney Lindsey Halligan handled residential and commercial insurance claims before joining Donald Trump's criminal defense team? Cbl62 (talk) 02:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cb162 - I wrote the original hook. I'm fine with either. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:41E3:B4CF:4CBB:9BA2 (talk) 07:14, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full review needed now that an ALT hook has been suggested. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:07, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - n
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - n

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: The Daily Beast should be used with caution. Given that this is an BLP, and the sentences about the roof cases are sourced only to The Daily Beast, I think you should look for further sources that cover that information or consider removing it. Fox News is not reliable on politics, but links to a video used as the source of the quote about the jugular (which it does verify) so I'm fine with it. I'm not sure why that sentence about the jugular is also sourced to the Newsweek article, as I can't find the quote there? If you retain the sentences about the roof case, you should rephrase, as it lights up on Earwig as a bit too similar. Alt1 is definitely an improvement on the earlier ones. There's enough issues for me to mark this maybe, but nothing that's difficult to fix. DrThneed (talk) 23:24, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Launchballer: This review is waiting on a response, but maybe you missed it? DrThneed (talk) 04:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not my nom. I nominated on behalf of an IP.--Laun chba ller 06:59, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note to nominator User:2603:7000:2101:AA00:CCC9:7E7B:26A9:1834: you should be monitoring your nominations since there's no effective way to ping an IP during a review since numbers are reassigned so frequently. Please respond to the review right away if you wish to pursue your nomination; otherwise, it's likely to be closed as abandoned. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The IP editor has not returned and there has been no significant movement in the article in about a month, so unless another editor is willing to adopt this nomination it's probably time to close this as abandoned. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]