Talk:Lindon Meikle

Lindon Meikle has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 4, 2017. (Reviewed version).

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: England / English non-league Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the English non-league task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Nottinghamshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nottinghamshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NottinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject NottinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject NottinghamshireNottinghamshire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

A fact from Lindon Meikle appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 July 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Lindon Meikle signed for Eastwood Town following a trial, after his father suggested he join his brother Deon at the club?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lindon Meikle.

Wikipedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lindon Meikle/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kaiser matias (talk · contribs) 22:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:

A good article, really comprehensive and detailed. However there is a major issue with citations. Checklinks shows there are a lot that are either not working (11, 13, 22, 26, 30, 35, 43) or outright dead (3, 5, 12, all of 16, 40, 41, 42, 51). But if you can get those cleaned up the article should be good to go. Kaiser matias (talk) 22:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for taking the time to review the article. The dead links in fact are okay, but for some reason Checklinks show them as being dead. Statto have a nasty habit of going offline, so I've archived those references. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 01:08, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seems you are correct that they say dead but a quick look at a couple random ones shows they indeed work, so I'm going to ignore what Checklinks says, and give it a pass. Kaiser matias (talk) 02:24, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]