Jump to content

Talk:Linda Yaccarino

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk16:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Linda Yaccarino
Linda Yaccarino

Created by Muboshgu (talk). Self-nominated at 18:52, 12 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Linda Yaccarino; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Nice article about someone who I can only assume we'll be seeing more of. Good to go. Schminnte (talk contribs) 21:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Schminnte and Muboshgu: We have to figure out the very high Earwig scores first. Bruxton (talk) 15:55, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bruxton, those top results on Earwig, not just the top two, appear to be mirrors. They copied us, not vice versa. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) @Bruxton, I'm reaffirming this. From a closer look at the sites highlighted (30% and above), they are all either posted after the article was created, or pretty obvious mirrors of Wikipedia. I ran Earwig's at the time of the review, and didn't see any high scores. So, I think this is fine. Schminnte (talk contribs) 16:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Schminnte and Muboshgu: thank you for the message I will take a closer look. Bruxton (talk) 16:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Schminnte and Muboshgu: looks like you are both right. The article starter should be flattered. Bruxton (talk) 16:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Why is there no reference to the amount of far right influencers she followed before she started at Twitter? Why has that been blocked? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.25.122.120 (talk) 20:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Misinformation

[edit]

Why does wikipedia have such a far left bias? You state this person follow far right accounts without any examples or further evidence. If this is worthy to include then provide evidence. 70.58.179.30 (talk) 04:42, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see any reference to the article subject following far right accounts. Could you please let me know where this is in the article? glman (talk) 01:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see you removed it. It has been readded. This section appears to be directly sourced by WP:RS. glman (talk) 01:15, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]