Talk:Linda Finch/GA3
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Aussie Article Writer (talk · contribs) 12:36, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Prose is clear and concise, spelling and grammar are correct. Tiny copyedit by me (and I mean tiny). | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | I like the quotes, in particular. The lead is very good, layout is appropriate, no words to watch that I can see. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |
Discussion
[edit]- Doug Coldwell can you address some of the reference issues? - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 13:48, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Working Thanks for review. Will start working on solving the issues. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 14:26, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Aussie Article Writer: All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:06, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Doug Coldwell: very close I feel, but have an NPOV concern. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 01:14, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Doug Coldwell congrats, another high quality GA nomination has passed! As always, I congratulate you on the high quality (and sheer number!) of articles you manage to get through. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 10:58, 17 July 2021 (UTC)