Talk:Lim Na-young

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guys, the efforts are not escaping the PROD and later AFD

Hi, please try try meet that criterion. I will make this unmarked unless improvements are made. This still doesn't escape AFD. Quek157 (talk) 17:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC) I personally think #6 still doesn't meet but will leave for 2O. --Quek157 (talk) 17:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quek157 I'm afraid I don't understand what you've said in the slightest. As far as prod goes, it can be removed for any reason by anyone. If you feel this should be deleted, take it to AfD. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:38, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently its the same thing as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhou Jieqiong, kept with NBAND #6 as a member of two different prominent bands. Snowflake91 (talk) 17:41, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

yes, I understand, I just hope that article is improved to watertight standards to meet the entire MUSICBIO standards (at least one), I watched Produce 101 / IOI / and want this to be preserved, but this is turned from redirect to an articles 3 times and turn back. Please make this a decent one can? Thanks. This is what I meant. --Quek157 (talk) 17:42, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Snowflake91 and Chrissymad:Good, accepted, remarked as ref improve (as the TV shows need improvement and I don't think the 2nd one is considered XtvN usually need soompi /allkop sources which then is WP:SNOW to defend. So can we remove or source properly??? --Quek157 (talk) 17:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Quek157: Soompi and Allkpop are both considered unreliable per discussion at WP:KO/RS Alexanderlee (talk) 17:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I am now exactly talking about sourcing as well as notablity. I am just doing a NPP. I had been lectured many times about WP:KO/RS and I know to use OSEN, Naver etc. but one question, then UNIT/UNB members all can have their own pages? As also fromis_9 that Produce 48 member if Jung Gyuri really ended up into the final group? This will be a little weird that some of the more prominent idols cannot but these can - the one in my mind is dahyun from twice. --Quek157 (talk) 17:54, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Quek157: ah my apologies I wasn’t meaning to come across as lecturing you I just saw you said “need soompi/Allkpop sources”. I must have misunderstood. Honestly I’m not sure with requirements anymore, #6 of WP:MUSICBIO would give warrant to so many articles, but I’ve also seen articles that would qualify due to #6 be deleted or redirected simply because they haven’t released any charged music. And in all honesty it sometimes seems that other editors don’t care if other points qualify an article, they simply delete/redirect because of that one qualifying point. I tend to stick more to source-related edits or those such as overlinking.

For example, BTS members repeatedly have their articles redirected despite passing #6 as there are four members who have articles. It’s all confusing to me really Alexanderlee (talk) 18:02, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexanderlee:, no problems, I am saying in jest as there is a particular user (whom I shall not name or ping) who always tend to say my sources isn't right, I use soompi, says WP:KO/RS, fine, then I used NAVER, then they wanted me to use the OSEN one which is the source of NAVER. Hence, I always use the list (but allkop is not reliable true, fake news somemore, soompi nowadays is even better than some sources for news - like the Late Night E News (SBS Tues 8:55) omitted Kim Seang Min scandal but was well covered by all, then is SBS reliable?). I also don't have any idea such AFD works. I just don't care about these AFD. This will end up as a redirect if nothing is done, I will not want to see this so I marked as refimprove and prima facie #6 met, but I am fine for any NPP to unmark and sent to AFD. --Quek157 (talk) 18:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Quek157: I see no problem wth using sources from Naver so long as it isn’t the blog section, if their information is from elsewhere they always state it and I’ve never seen Naver be unreliable. I don’t understand it either, I’m with you on that one :’) Alexanderlee (talk) 18:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, I think you will know who I am referring to here. Anyway, happy improvingg --Quek157 (talk) 18:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Impressive of you guys

wow...i did not anything about wikipedia article...a lot...i mean the notability in making an article...thanks guys you teach me a lot tonight...i hope to learn more from you guys honourable mention Alexanderlee (talk · contribs) and others.

Can always visit AFC. --Quek157 (talk) 18:39, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confused

What is AFD and Prod...actually??? Road boyz24 (talk) 18:36, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PROD = proposed deletion (anyone can challenge), should be non controversial , anyone can remove. If that is so, the person who slapped PROD can go to AFD where a formal discussion (at least 7 days) will be to see WP:N / WP:NOT is met. If so, keep, if not, delete, if there are WP:ATD, do it. see WP:AFD for more details --Quek157 (talk) 18:38, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]