Talk:Lightweight Portable Security

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computer Security: Computing

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Name change

As of now, the name seems to have changed to TENS. See https://www.spi.dod.mil/lipose.htm --Elmeter (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's Trusted End Node Security. That should at least redirect here and be mentioned here. The main DoD page about this is still titled Lightweight Portable Security, but the text uses Trusted End Node Security. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 19:00, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Any methods to solve the https issue?

Are there any way to verify the website on a normal browser that don't auto trust it? For example, a key for the certificate from trusted resource? It's very important to get a legit copy of the OS especially for a security-purposed system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.33.79.220 (talk) 15:31, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lightweight Portable Security. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120902023526/http://www.spi.dod.mil/lipose.htm to http://www.spi.dod.mil/lipose.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

www.tens.af.mil dead?

Regrettably, the official TENS website has become unreachable. The commercial gettens website still works, although it is less than helpful under the present conditions. I first noticed this 4 September, so recommend we wait a little longer before declaring the TENS site dead and editing the article accordingly. Condensinguponitself (talk) 21:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TENS (and the older SPI) web site still unavailable. Time to concede TENS is dead, or at least no longer in active development. I made a few edits, including changing the status of all the citations using that web site to "dead". Incidentally, it appears Internet Archive did a good job of capturing the web site's final status. I haven't actually tried to download the whole thing, but appears Internet Archive even captured TENS itself. Condensinguponitself (talk) 16:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]