Jump to content

Talk:Liberal Democratic Party (Serbia, 1989)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 21:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 20:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll be reviewing this article, good luck. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Discusion

[edit]

Earwig found absolutely nothing wrong. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:34, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The image is used appropriately and the fair use has a good reason. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The page has no edit warring, there haven't been any reverts since 2022. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:37, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I can't think of anything else to add; it has history, ideology, organization, and elections sections. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed all grammatical issues I could find and I couldn't find any parts that were overly detailed. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:56, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article isn't very biased. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spotcheck

[edit]

Time for a source spotcheck. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will check 8 at random, they will be 7, 9, 15, 31, 52, 49, 17, and 62. I can do more if necessary. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:07, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Number 7 needs to say that it was registered as a political party on 15 August 1990. It doesn't seem to say that anywhere. @Vacant0 can you please tell me where it is in the source? History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:13, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Under the section Rešenje o Upisu političkih organizacija u registar političkih organizacija p. 55, the party is listed as 24th, with registration date 15 August 1990. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 22:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I see now. I am going to go ahead and pass this, good job. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I see now. I am going to go ahead and pass this, good job. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
9 should say that it presented its programme on Radio Television of Belgrade. Same problem as before. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:15, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
15 should give results for the party in an election and it does on page 3. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:17, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
On p. 11, there is a small section called "TV Beograd" (Radio Television of Belgrade). The party had its programme presented at 9 p.m on RTS1. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 22:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
31 says what it needs too, I think. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:20, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
52 says druženje je osnovano na Bogojavljenje 19.01.2010 godine kao pravni naslednik programa i prava na imovinu Liberalno-demokratske stranke a osnivači su sem stranke i Ravnogorski pokret i Jovan Pavlović kao fizičko lice. Which says Serbian Monarchists are the legal successor of the Liber Democratic Party. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:22, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
49 says what it needs to here; "Pooštrili smo uslove i za nastanak i za opstanak političkih stranaka. Nema više sumnji kad se neka stranka registruje da li iza nje stoje građani", rekao je Marković za Radio-televiziju Srbije najavljujući preregistraciju stranaka koja počinje 23. jula. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:24, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure that 27 says what it needs too. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:24, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
62 says what it needs to about the party being present at the SDS assembly. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:26, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright Vacant0, I can pass this if you explain where the necessary info is in the sources 7 and 9. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:27, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.