Jump to content

Talk:Libby Copeland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Creating controversy versus being controversial

Copeland writes controversial articles, but herself is not a controversial journalist.

Creating controversy deals with the content of journalist's writing. Being controversial has to do with the personal life of the reporter herself.

Compare: Ann Coulter's editorial writing and statements to the media to support those writing are controversial, but their is little about her personal life which is truly controversial. In contrast, Deborah Norville's journalism on the Today show was fairly straight-ahead, but the fact that she was perceived as ousting Jane Pauley was controversial.

-Cranky1000 17:22, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Libby Copeland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:36, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]