Talk:Liar Liar GE2017

Songs Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reggae Low‑importance

	This article is part of the Reggae WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the coverage of articles relating to ska and reggae. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.ReggaeWikipedia:WikiProject ReggaeTemplate:WikiProject ReggaeReggae
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Liar Liar GE2017 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Legal issues?

Should it be pointed out that there are good legal issues and not necessarily pure censorship involved, from https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Party_political_broadcast "In the United Kingdom the Communications Act 2003 prohibits political advertising on television or radio; parties are instead allocated broadcast slots (usually around five minutes long) free of charge on broadcast channels using a formula set by Parliament."

Maybe something along the lines of "Due to regulations designed to give all parties fair advertising platform in the run up to elections, radio and TV stations may be unsure whether such a song could be considered political advertising which is illegal to broadcast in the UK outside of specific circumstances." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ewanm89 (talk • contribs) 10:42, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Ewenm89. That could well be the reason, but we can only add something to that effect if we can find a reliable secondary source that states this, and can be cited. Otherwise it would be seen as our own "original research". Regards, Esowteric+Talk 10:48, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if there's (say) an official government web site where such regulations are spelt out? Esowteric+Talk 10:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think I can get a paragraph out of this from Ofcom. Esowteric+Talk 11:00, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done I think that aspect is covered now. Thanks again.Esowteric+Talk 16:57, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page for Captain SKA?

Maybe someone could work on the page for the band Captain SKA themselves (currently a stub)?

The band's own web site and social media accounts use the name "Captain SKA", though many media articles use "Captain Ska". The band was also shown in the UK Singles Chart as "Captain SKA".

Regards, Esowteric+Talk 19:48, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maintaining a neutral point of view

I know, it's tempting to call May a liar, accuse the BBC of censorship, or refer to Donald Trump's "tiny hands", but we need to put on our Wikipedian hats and maintain a neutral point of view. The sources speak for themselves. Regards, Esowteric+Talk 13:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Title of section on alleged censorship

Following up on the previous comments here, I've re-titled the section to "airplay." That title is more descriptive of the contents contained in said section, and avoids the connotations aroused by the use the term "censorship." Indeed, the allegations of censorship by Captain SKA and the band's supporters are dealt with in a neutral fashion in the body of the section, but section title appears to editorialize more than it should. I'm not willing to edit war this point, but I strongly believe that the section, if it is titled "censorship" violates NPOV, specifically WP:POVNAMING. schetm (talk) 06:48, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]