Talk:Lexie Grey/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 05:35, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- Not sure how to address this. It appears that both of those links go to the right place. TRLIJC19 (talk) 12:48, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, probably just a checklinks error. I didn't personally check to see if there was an issue. Statυs (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- One of the two is now fixed ;) Sofffie7 (talk) 07:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, probably just a checklinks error. I didn't personally check to see if there was an issue. Statυs (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- There were very few issues with the lead that I adjusted myself.
- A few issues with the references. Publishers missing for USA Today and People. Check to make sure the rest are all accurate.
- Done Checked the rest. TRLIJC19 (talk) 12:48, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- I have no further issues. It is a well written and sourced article.
Statυs (talk) 03:32, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for picking up the article for review, so quickly! TRLIJC19 (talk) 12:48, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- You are most very welcome! Statυs (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for picking up the article for review, so quickly! TRLIJC19 (talk) 12:48, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Spotted a few more issues with the references. The Sydney Morning Herald is also missing a publisher, and should be linked. Just take a second look and make sure all works and references have links if available and that there are publishers. Statυs (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- I linked it and put the publisher. I also put the publishers for USA Today, TVLine, People and Entertainment Weekly. I don't know if the ABC links and E! Online are correct, if they are publishers. I saw on some GA pages that when E! Online is in "work", E! is publisher BUT I also saw work=E! Online, publisher=NBUniversal and work=E! Online, publisher=Comcast. Which model do you recommend? I hope that you understand what I'm trying to explain ;) --Sofffie7 (talk) 20:07, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- I'd say NBCUniversal is the best bet for publisher, as it is shown in the copyright of their website: "Copyright 2012 E! Entertainment Television, LLC. A Division of NBCUniversal." Statυs (talk) 20:25, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- OK thanks, it is now changed. For the few references left (The Insider, the three from ABC, and the SAG one), I don't know if they are correct. --Sofffie7 (talk) 07:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- I've addressed several more typos and ref issues, and believe we can now call it Done. TRLIJC19 (talk) 14:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- OK thanks, it is now changed. For the few references left (The Insider, the three from ABC, and the SAG one), I don't know if they are correct. --Sofffie7 (talk) 07:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Everything looks good to me. Passing the article! Great work! Statυs (talk) 18:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for reviewing and passing! TRLIJC19 (talk) 18:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)