Jump to content

Talk:Lex orandi, lex credendi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Anglican section needs editing and correcting particularly the false information written about the Anglo-Catholics. If it is factual it needs referencing so others can check the full reference.

Membership in Catholicism Project

[edit]

It is my motion that this article be removed from the WikiProject Catholicism. While it may be somewhat important to note that this is one way in which Anglicans differ from Catholics, it is definitely an Anglican-only doctrine (non-Catholic). --TheTriumvir 00:45, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Discussion

[edit]

Do we really need two pages, when all you have to say about the ancient principle is summed up in a sentence? Fishhead64 21:41, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The merge looks like a good thing. I would love to see editors with some knowledge of the ancient ecumenical councils, and of Catholic and Orthodox Churches, contribute some to this. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 20:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Orthodox

[edit]

According to Bishop Ware, this is also a belief in the Eastern Orthodox church. See his quote in Ordination of women#Eastern Orthodox for more details. -- Cat Whisperer 23:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anglicanism references

[edit]

Benandorsqueaks added a cite references tag for the Anglicanism section. Suffice to say, the references are summed up by the works cited in the bibliography. fishhead64 (talk) 02:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ars celebrandi

[edit]

The article should maybe give mention to the related phrase Ars celebrandi, and if it can't, a good stub article would be appreciated. ADM (talk) 21:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution

[edit]

Perhaps some mention could be made of who first coined the phrase, legem credendi lex statuat supplicandi? Rwflammang (talk) 18:54, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm no anglican

[edit]

But these edits strike me as extremely tendentious, as well as unlikely on their face:[1].

Certainly the statements about Roman Catholic doctrine are false, not to mention off topic.

Since these edits, and indeed the whole anglican section, are devoid of references, I purpose to delete them.

Rwflammang (talk) 23:24, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Anglican section is still off topic. It has been marked as problematic. I propose to delete most of it. Rick Jelliffe (talk) 03:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
checkY I have reduced this to two sentences. I take the gist of the OP as being that "lex orandi, lex credendi" envisages liturgy as sectarian propaganda: when your beliefs change, you need to revise the liturgy to reflect it. For those in power, their beliefs (lex credendi) gets to determine the liturgy (lex orandi), and then for the people in the pews this reformed lex orandi determines lex credendi. But as there are no sources for this, I have not put it in those terms.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lex orandi, lex credendi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lex orandi, lex credendi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lex_orandi,_lex_credendi&oldid=1239561950"